Cited by 31Wound Healing and TreatmentsNerve injury and regenerationPlanarian Biology and Electrostimulation

Direct contact of fibroblasts with neuronal processes promotes differentiation to myofibroblasts and induces contraction of collagen matrix in vitro

Fujiwara, Toshihiro, Kubo, Tateki, Kanazawa, Shigeyuki, Shingaki, Kenta, Taniguchi, Manabu, Matsuzaki, Shinsuke, Gurtner, Geoffrey C., Tohyama, Masaya +1 more·2013·Wound Repair and Regeneration

Abstract

Wound healing is often delayed in the patients whose sensory and autonomic innervation is impaired. We hypothesized that existence of neurites in the skin may promote wound healing by inducing differentiation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts with consequent wound contraction. In the current study, we examined the effect of neurons on differentiation of fibroblasts and contraction of collagen matrix in vitro using a new co‐culture model. Neuronal cell line, PC12 cells, of which the neurite outgrowth can be controlled by adding nerve growth factor, was used. Rat dermal fibroblasts were co‐cultured with PC12 cells extending neurites or with PC12 cells lacking neurites. Then, differentiation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts and contraction of the collagen matrix was evaluated. Finally, we examined whether direct or indirect contact with neurites of PC12 cells promoted the differentiation of fibroblasts. Our results showed that fibroblasts co‐cultured with PC12 extending neurites differentiated into myofibroblasts more effectively and contracted the collagen matrix stronger than those with PC12 lacking neurites. Direct contact of fibroblasts with neurites promoted more differentiation than indirect contact. In conclusion, direct contact of fibroblasts with neuronal processes is important for differentiation into myofibroblasts and induction of collagen gel contraction, leading to promotion of wound healing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/wrr.12059

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fujiwara, T., Kubo, T., Kanazawa, S., Shingaki, K., Taniguchi, M., Matsuzaki, S., Gurtner, G. C., Tohyama, M., & Hosokawa, K.
Affiliations
  • Department of Plastic Surgery Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Osaka Japan
  • The University of Osaka (JP)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Kubo, Tateki
Venue
Wound Repair and Regeneration
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-06-11
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
588-594
ISSN
  • 1067-1927 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-475X
OpenAlex
W1951736946
Cited by
31
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Wound Repair and Regeneration (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Planarian Biology and Electrostimulation
Keywords
myofibroblast differentiation, fibroblasts, neurites, collagen matrix contraction, wound healing, PC12 cells, nerve growth factor, dermal fibroblasts, sensory innervation, direct cell contact
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Communication, Cell Differentiation, Cells, Cultured, Collagen, Extracellular Matrix, Fibroblasts, Neurons, Wound Healing, Neurites, PC12 Cells, Coculture Techniques, Dermis, Nerve Growth Factor, Rats, Myofibroblasts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review