Cited by 30Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPsychiatric care and mental health services

Understanding the experience of diagnostic overshadowing associated with severe mental illness from the consumer and health professional perspective: a qualitative systematic review protocol

Molloy, Renee, Munro, Ian, Pope, Nicole·2021·JBI Evidence Synthesis

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review is to identify, appraise, and synthesize available qualitative evidence related to diagnostic overshadowing in mental health consumers who present with clinical manifestations of physical illness. INTRODUCTION: A lived experience of mental illness is associated with compromised physical health and decreased life expectancy. Mental health consumers face greater barriers to accessing treatment for physical illnesses and are less likely to receive appropriate physical care than those without mental illness. Physical illnesses may go underdiagnosed and undertreated in mental health consumers because clinicians tend to focus on the mental illness to the exclusion of other health problems, a phenomenon called diagnostic overshadowing. This systematic review will combine the experiences of mental health consumers and health care professionals to gain deeper understanding of diagnostic overshadowing. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review will consider qualitative studies that include the experiences of diagnostic overshadowing in mental health consumers and/or the health care professionals who treat them. Studies conducted in any health care facility or service offering care for physical illnesses will be considered. METHODS: MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus will be searched along with sources of gray literature. Studies in English published from 2004 onward will be considered. Retrieval of full-text studies, assessment of methodological quality, and data extraction will be performed independently by two reviewers. Findings will, where possible, be pooled using JBI SUMARI with the meta-aggregation approach. A ConQual Summary of Findings will be presented. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42020186418.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.11124/jbies-20-00244

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Molloy, R., Munro, I., & Pope, N.
Affiliations
Monash University (AU)
Venue
JBI Evidence Synthesis
Published
2020-11-07
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
1362-1368
ISSN
2689-8381 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3099560059
Cited by
30
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JBI Evidence Synthesis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
diagnostic overshadowing, severe mental illness, physical illness, mental health service users, healthcare workers, lived experience, underdiagnosis, undertreatment, physical health in mental illness
MeSH terms
Systematic Reviews as Topic, Mental Disorders, Health Personnel, Humans, Mental Health, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review