Cited by 54Muscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and TrainingMuscle Physiology and Disorders

Short inter-set rest blunts resistance exercise-induced increases in myofibrillar protein synthesis and intracellular signalling in young males

McKendry, James, Pérez‐López, Alberto, McLeod, Michael, Luo, Dan, Dent, Jessica R., Smeuninx, Benoit, Yu, Jinglei, Taylor, Angela E. +2 more·2016·Experimental Physiology

Abstract

New Findings: What is the central question of this study? Does shorter rest between sets of resistance exercise promote a superior circulating hormonal and acute muscle anabolic response compared with longer rest periods? What is the main finding and its importance? We demonstrate that short rest (1 min) between sets of moderate‐intensity, high‐volume resistance exercise blunts the acute muscle anabolic response compared with a longer rest period (5 min), despite a superior circulating hormonal milieu. These data have important implications for the development of training regimens to maximize muscle hypertrophy. Manipulating the rest‐recovery interval between sets of resistance exercise may influence training‐induced muscle remodelling. The aim of this study was to determine the acute muscle anabolic response to resistance exercise performed with short or long inter‐set rest intervals. In a study with a parallel‐group design, 16 males completed four sets of bilateral leg‐press and knee‐extension exercise at 75% of one‐repetition maximum to momentary muscular failure, followed by ingestion of 25 g of whey protein. Resistance exercise sets were interspersed by 1 min (n = 8) or 5 min of passive rest (n = 8). Muscle biopsies were obtained at rest, 0, 4, 24 and 28 h postexercise during a primed continuous infusion of l‐[ring‐13 C 6]phenylalanine to determine myofibrillar protein synthesis and intracellular signalling. We found that the rate of myofibrillar protein synthesis increased above resting values from 0 to 4 h postexercise with 1 (76%; P = 0.047) and 5 min inter‐set rest (152%; P < 0.001) and was significantly greater in the 5 min inter‐set rest group (P = 0.001). Myofibrillar protein synthesis rates at 24–28 h postexercise remained elevated above resting values (P < 0.05) and were indistinguishable between groups. Postexercise p70S6K Thr389 and rpS6 Ser240/244 phosphorylation were reduced with 1 compared with 5 min inter‐set rest, whereas phosphorylation of eEF2 Thr56, TSC2 Thr1462, AMPK Thr172 and REDD1 protein were greater for 1 compared with 5 min inter‐set rest. Serum testosterone was greater at 20–40 min postexercise and plasma lactate greater immediately postexercise for 1 versus 5 min inter‐set rest. Resistance exercise with short (1 min) inter‐set rest duration attenuated myofibrillar protein synthesis during the early postexercise recovery period compared with longer (5 min) rest duration, potentially through compromised activation of intracellular signalling.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/ep085647

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Given research showing a potential hypertrophic detriment to employing short rest intervals in resistance-trained individuals, differences in rest periods may have confounded the results of Mangine et al.

    “Given research showing a potential hypertrophic detriment to employing short rest intervals in resistance-trained individuals [50,51], it is conceivable that differences in rest periods may have confounded the results of Mangine et al. [22].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McKendry, J., Pérez‐López, A., McLeod, M., Luo, D., Dent, J. R., Smeuninx, B., Yu, J., Taylor, A. E., Philp, A., & Breen, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • Universidad de Alcalá (ES)
Corresponding author
Breen, Leigh
Venue
Experimental Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-06-02
Volume
101
Issue
7
Pages
866-882
ISSN
  • 0958-0670 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-445X
OpenAlex
W2343674619
Cited by
54
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4
FWCI
4.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
Keywords
resistance training, myofibrillar protein synthesis, muscle hypertrophy, p70S6K phosphorylation, eEF2 phosphorylation, TSC2, AMPK, REDD1, testosterone, insulin-like growth factor I, mTOR signaling, whey protein, leg press, knee extension, muscle protein synthesis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Humans, Male, Muscle Proteins, Myofibrils, Phosphorylation, Rest, Protein Biosynthesis, Signal Transduction, Exercise, Muscle, Skeletal, Ribosomal Protein S6 Kinases, 70-kDa, Resistance Training, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review