Cited by 34Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsConnexins and lens biologyIon Channels and Receptors

Intercellular Ca2+ signalling in the adult mouse cochlea

Open access
Sirko, Piotr, Gale, Jonathan E, Ashmore, Jonathan F·2019·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

Key points Intercellular Ca2+ waves are increases in cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels that propagate between cells. Periodic Ca2+ waves have been linked to gene regulation and are thought to play a crucial role in the development of our hearing epithelium, the organ of Corti and the acquisition of hearing. We observed regular periodic intercellular Ca2+ waves in supporting cells of an ex vivo preparation of the adult mouse organ of Corti, and these waves were found to propagate independently of extracellular ATP and were inhibited by the gap junction blockers 1‐octanol and carbenoxolone. Our results establish that the existence of periodic Ca2+ waves in the organ of Corti is not restricted to the prehearing period. Abstract We have investigated wave‐like cytoplasmic calcium (Ca2+) signalling in an ex vivo preparation of the adult mouse organ of Corti. Two types of intercellular Ca2+ waves that differ in propagation distance and speed were observed. One type was observed to travel up to 100 μm with an average velocity of 7 μm/s. Such waves were initiated by local tissue damage in the outer hair cell region. The propagation distance was decreased when the purinergic receptor antagonists pyridoxalphosphate‐6‐azophenyl‐2′,4′‐disulfonic acid (PPADS; 50 μm) or suramin (150 μm) were added to the extracellular buffer. Immunocytochemical analysis and experiments with calcium indicator dyes showed that both P2X and P2Y receptors were present in supporting cells. A second class of waves identified to travel longitudinally along the organ of Corti propagated at a lower velocity of 1–3 μm/s. These ‘slow’ Ca2+ waves were particularly evident in the inner sulcus and Deiters’ cells. They travelled for distances of up to 500 μm. The slow Ca2+ signalling varied periodically (approximately one wave every 10 min) and was maintained for more than 3 h. The slow waves were not affected by apyrase, or by the P2 receptor agonists suramin (150 μm) or PPADS (50 μm) but were blocked by the connexin channel blockers octanol (1 mm) and carbenoxolone (100 μm). It is proposed that the observed Ca2+ waves might be a physiological response to a change in extracellular environment and may be involved in critical gene regulation activities in the supporting cells of the cochlea.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jp276400

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ex vivo cochlear calcium waves slow from an initial velocity of 10-15 μm/s with distance from the site of lesion.

    “Similarly to those in living skin, ex vivo cochlear calcium waves slow from an initial velocity of 10–15 μm/s with distance from the site of lesion (13, 24).”

    From Damage-evoked signals in cochlear neurons and supporting cells (2024) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Results section, “Imaging Ca2+ spread in the in situ cochlea” (page unavailable), reports lesion-initiated calcium waves in the ex vivo cochlea, with average speeds of 6.5 ± 3.4 and 7.2 ± 3 μm/s. It does not report an initial speed of 10–15 μm/s or that the waves slow with distance from the lesion. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sirko, P., Gale, J. E., & Ashmore, J. F.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Ashmore, Jonathan F
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-11-22
Volume
597
Issue
1
Pages
303-317
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2896680006
Cited by
34
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (Ref 093084)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Connexins and lens biology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
Keywords
intercellular calcium waves, organ of Corti, cochlear supporting cells, gap junctions, connexin channels, P2X receptors, P2Y receptors, purinergic signaling, Deiters' cells, outer hair cells, gene expression regulation, mouse cochlea, suramin
MeSH terms
Adenosine Triphosphate, Animals, Calcium, Cochlea, Female, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Calcium Signaling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review