The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens
Open accessAbstract
1. Kittens were visually deprived by suturing the lids of the right eye for various periods of time at different ages. Recordings were subsequently made from the striate cortex, and responses from the two eyes compared. As previously reported, monocular eye closure during the first few months of life causes a sharp decline in the number of cells that can be influenced by the previously closed eye. 2. Susceptibility to the effects of eye closure begins suddenly near the start of the fourth week, remains high until some time between the sixth and eighth weeks, and then declines, disappearing finally around the end of the third month. Monocular closure for over a year in an adult cat produces no detectable effects. 3. During the period of high susceptibility in the fourth and fifth weeks eye closure for as little as 3‐4 days leads to a sharp decline in the number of cells that can be driven from both eyes, as well as an over‐all decline in the relative influence of the previously closed eye. A 6‐day closure is enough to give a reduction in the number of cells that can be driven by the closed eye to a fraction of the normal. The physiological picture is similar to that following a 3‐month monocular deprivation from birth, in which the proportion of cells the eye can influence drops from 85 to about 7%. 4. Cells of the lateral geniculate receiving input from a deprived eye are noticeably smaller and paler to Nissl stain following 3 or 6 days' deprivation during the fourth week. 5. Following 3 months of monocular deprivation, opening the eye for up to 5 yr produces only a very limited recovery in the cortical physiology, and no obvious recovery of the geniculate atrophy, even though behaviourally there is some return of vision in the deprived eye. Closing the normal eye, though necessary for behavioural recovery, has no detectable effect on the cortical physiology. The amount of possible recovery in the striate cortex is probably no greater if the period of eye closure is limited to weeks, but after a 5‐week closure there is a definite enhancement of the recovery, even though it is far from complete.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“It is noteworthy that critical periods for sensory plasticity occur in the same preadolescent period in which remodeling of connectivity occurs.34, 48, 49”
From A role for synaptic plasticity in the adolescent development of executive function (2013) · cites this paper as [48]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“These sensitive windows are known as critical periods 35 , and constitute another major milestone in the development of brain circuits.”
From Developmental timing and critical windows for the treatment of psychiatric disorders (2016) · cites this paper as [35]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 · Cited by 13,680
Self-citationSINGLE-CELL RESPONSES IN STRIATE CORTEX OF KITTENS DEPRIVED OF VISION IN ONE EYE
Wiesel, T. N., & Hubel, D. H. (1963) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1963.26.6.1003 · Cited by 2,628
Self-citationWiesel, T. N., & Hubel, D. H. (1965) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1965.28.6.1029 · Cited by 1,598
Self-citationBINOCULAR INTERACTION IN STRIATE CORTEX OF KITTENS REARED WITH ARTIFICIAL SQUINT
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1965) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1965.28.6.1041 · Cited by 1,369
Self-citationWiesel, T. N., & Hubel, D. H. (1963) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1963.26.6.978 · Cited by 1,291
Self-citationRECEPTIVE FIELDS OF CELLS IN STRIATE CORTEX OF VERY YOUNG, VISUALLY INEXPERIENCED KITTENS
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1963) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1963.26.6.994 · Cited by 1,113
Self-citationEXTENT OF RECOVERY FROM THE EFFECTS OF VISUAL DEPRIVATION IN KITTENS
Wiesel, T. N., & Hubel, D. H. (1965) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1965.28.6.1060 · Cited by 704
Self-citationApical dendritic spines of the visual cortex and light deprivation in the mouse
Valverde, P. (1967) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00237559 · Cited by 483
Consequences of monocular deprivation on visual behaviour in kittens
DEWS, P. B., & Wiesel, T. N. (1970) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009023 · Cited by 266
Self-citationThe effect of visual deprivation on cortical neurons: A Golgi study
Globus, A., & Scheibel, A. B. (1967) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/0014-4886(67)90029-5 · Cited by 247
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,015 of 1,015
Regional and temporal specificity of intrinsic plasticity mechanisms in rodent primary visual cortex
Nataraj, K., & Turrigiano, G. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4455-11.2011 · Cited by 23
Kennedy, T., & Broadie, K. (2018) · eneuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0346-18.2018 · Cited by 21
Nagakura, I., Van Wart, A., Petravicz, J., Tropea, D., & Sur, M. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0189-14.2014 · Cited by 18
Maria Montessori and Neuroscience: The Trailblazing Insights of an Exceptional Mind
Fabri, M., & Fortuna, S. (2020) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858420902677 · Cited by 13
Lackner, J. R., & DiZio, P. (1992) · The Head-Neck Sensory Motor System · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195068207.003.0033 · Cited by 11
Increased levels of testosterone have little effect on visual cortex plasticity in the kitten
Daw, N. W., Baysinger, K. J., & Parkinson, D. (1987) · Journal of Neurobiology · doi:10.1002/neu.480180203 · Cited by 7
Enhancement of psychotherapy using epigenetic modulating drugs
Gavin, D. P., Chase, K. A., & Sharma, R. P. (2011) · Medical Hypotheses · doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2011.03.042 · Cited by 6
Crair (2001) · doi:10.1002/1096-9861(20010205)430:2
Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe - Crowne Social Desirability Scale
Reynolds, W. M. (1982) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/1097-4679(198201)38:1
Phillips (2000) · doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(20000605)421:3
Leigh (1998) · doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-8644(199811)107:3
Metadata
- Authors
- Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1970-02
- Volume
- 206
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 419-436
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- PMC
- PMC1348655
- OpenAlex
- W2104220712
- Cited by
- 3,030
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 44 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 77 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 83 · 2014: 70 · 2013: 85 · 2012: 87
- FWCI
- 30.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Keywords
- monocular deprivation, eyelid closure, kittens, primary visual cortex, lateral geniculate nucleus, visual development, critical period, cortical plasticity, visual recovery, binocular vision
- MeSH terms
- Age Factors, Animals, Cats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review