Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Oxytocin release following osmotic activation of oxytocin neurones in the paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei

Open access
Brimble, M. J., Dyball, R. E. J., Forsling, Mary L.·1978·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. Recordings were made from a total of 35 antidromically identified neurones in the paraventricular (PV) and supraoptic (SO) nuclei of urethane‐anaesthetized lactating rats. During recording plasma osmotic pressure was raised by 12 m‐osmole/kg by injection of hypertonic solutions of NaCl, LiCl, or mannitol. 2. Nine PV neurones (mean firing rate 4·2 ± 1·0 ( S.E.) spikes/sec) were classified as oxytocin cells because they gave a burst of activity before reflex milk‐ejections. None of these showed a bursting (phasic) firing pattern. Ten PV neurones (mean firing rate 1·8 ± 0·2 spikes/sec) fired phasically either before or after injection of hypertonic NaCl and were classified as vasopressin cells. The remaining six PV cells (mean firing rate 1·6 ± 0·9 spikes/sec) showed no bursts of firing related to milk ejection and did not fire phasically. 3. Increasing plasma osmotic pressure by injection of hypertonic NaCl increased the mean firing rate of PV oxytocin cells to 7·0 ± 1·0 spikes/sec. Vasopressin cells in the PV nucleus were much less responsive and the mean firing rate after injection was 2·9 ± 0·4 spikes/sec. The third group of PV neurones was unresponsive. 4. Plasma oxytocin concentration (determined by radioimmunoassay) increased from 2·1 ± 0·3 μu./ml. in the control period to 10·9 ± 2·8 μu./ml. 30 min after I.P. injection of 1 ml. 1·5 M‐NaCl and to 14·8 ± 2·8 μu./ml. following injection of a second 1 ml. 1·5 M‐NaCl. 5. The responses of oxytocin and vasopressin neurones in the SO nucleus to an increase in plasma osmotic pressure following injections of hypertonic solutions of LiCl or mannitol were similar to those observed when plasma osmotic pressure was raised by NaCl. 6. It may be concluded that both oxytocin and vasopressin cells in the neurohypophysical system are responsive to the osmotic pressure of the blood plasma rather than to Na+ or Cl− concentration, that osmotic activation of oxytocin cells releases sufficient oxytocin to increase its plasma concentration, and that there may be a functional difference between the SO and PV nuclei.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012293

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Brimble, M. J., Dyball, R. E. J., & Forsling, M. L.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1978-05
Volume
278
Issue
1
Pages
69-78
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2026972039
Cited by
162
References
2
FWCI
12.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oxytocin release following osmotic activation of oxytocin neurones in the paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012293
The paper
Brimble, M. J., Dyball, R. E. J., & Forsling, M. L. (1978). Oxytocin release following osmotic activation of oxytocin neurones in the paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012293

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.