Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 318

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sprouting and regression of neuromuscular synapses in partially denervated mammalian muscles.

Open access
Brown, M C, Ironton, R·1978·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. The capacity of motor units to sprout after partial denervation and the ability of regenerating axons to suppress newly formed sprouts was examined in mouse skeletal muscle. Most experiments were performed on the peroneus tertius muscle which has 300 muscle fibres and eleven motor units ranging in strength from 1 to 35% of the total muscle tension. 2. Individual units, regardless of starting size, were able to sprout by up to 5 times their normal size following interruption of one of the two spinal roots innervating the muscle. In practive this resulted in muscles which had three or more units left intact becoming completely innervated again within 12 days. The majority of the sprouts probably innervated the old denervated end‐plate sites. In the absence of re‐innervation by the severed motor axons the sprouts persisted. In peroneus tertius about 60% of the sprouts giving rise to end‐plates arose terminally and 40% collaterally. In soleus almost all the sprouts were terminal. 3. Re‐innervation of the muscle by the severed motor axons occurred, starting from 14 days onwards after a crush injury, 19 days onwards after a cut. Re‐innervation occurred even in muscles which presumably had no remaining denervated muscle fibres at the time regenerating axons reached the muscle. The re‐innervating fibres grew to the original end‐plate sites. 4. Following re‐innervation the size of sprouted motor units apparently decreased. Thus, after re‐innervation of muscles with three or more sprouted motor units, the sprouted units no longer caused contraction of all the muscle. However, the normal state of the muscle was not restored and the sprouted units continued to innervate more muscle fibres than normal, returning axons less than normal, and a small percentage of muscle fibres (ca. 10%) remained functionally innervated by axons of both sorts. 5. It is concluded that (i) in the mouse, axonal sprouting is a rapid and efficient process for restoring innervation; (ii) re‐innervation of already innervated fibres can occur if the regenerating axons can return to existing end‐plate sites; (iii) some of the redundant innervation is removed or repressed. 6. Possible mechanisms of competition between axon terminals are considered.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012307

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Metadata

Authors
Brown, M. C., & Ironton, R.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1978-05
Volume
278
Issue
1
Pages
325-348
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W1988842990
Cited by
318
References
25
FWCI
7.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sprouting and regression of neuromuscular synapses in partially denervated mammalian muscles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012307
The paper
Brown, M. C., & Ironton, R. (1978). Sprouting and regression of neuromuscular synapses in partially denervated mammalian muscles. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012307

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.