Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Blocking effects of barium and hydrogen ions on the potassium current during anomalous rectification in the starfish egg.

Open access
Hagiwara, S, Miyazaki, S, Moody, W, Patlak, J·1978·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. The blocking effects of Ba+ and H+ on the inward K current during anomalous rectification of the giant egg membrane of the starfish, Mediaster aequalis, were studied using voltage clamp techniques. 2. External Ba2+ at a low concentration (10‐‐100 micron) suppresses the inward K current; the extent of suppression, expressed as the ratio of currents with and without Ba2+, can be described by a conventional bimolecular adsorption isotherm, K/(K + [Ba2+]o), K being an apparent dissociation constant. 3. The dissociation constant, K, decreases as the membrane potential V becomes more negative and can be expressed by K(V) = K(0) exp (zmuFV/RT), where K(0) is the K at V = 0, z is the charge of the blocking ion, and mu is a parameter for the membrane potential dependence of Ba2+ blockage. The value of mu ranges between 0.64 and 0.68. 4. Upon a sudden change in membrane potential the change in the blocking effect of Ba2+ follows first order kinetics; the forward rate constant is membrane‐potential‐dependent whereas the backward constant is potential‐independent. 5. The blocking effect of Ba2+ appears to be independent of the activation of K channels during anomalous rectification. 6. The blocking effect of Ba2+ depends on V alone, in contrast to the activation of the K channel during anomalous rectification which depends on V‐‐VK. 7. In these respects, the effect of Ba2+ is equivalent to the introduction of inactivation into the anomalous rectification. 8. SI2+ and Ca2+ show small but observable blocking effects only at much higher concentrations (about 10‐‐20 mM). 9. The inward K current is suppressed when the external pH is reduced below 6.0. The blocking effect of H+ shows no significant potential dependence. The concentration dependence suggests that three H+ ions simultaneously titrate the acidic groups of each channel (pK = 5.3‐‐5.4). 10. The implications of these results are discussed in terms of molecular models of the potassium channel of anomalous rectification and possible mechanisms of K channel inactivation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012338

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 276

Metadata

Authors
Hagiwara, S., Miyazaki, S., Moody, W., & Patlak, J.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1978-06
Volume
279
Issue
1
Pages
167-185
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2028473674
Cited by
276
References
1
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blocking effects of barium and hydrogen ions on the potassium current during anomalous rectification in the starfish egg. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012338
The paper
Hagiwara, S., Miyazaki, S., Moody, W., & Patlak, J. (1978). Blocking effects of barium and hydrogen ions on the potassium current during anomalous rectification in the starfish egg. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012338

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.