Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 223

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electrophysiological properties of neonatal rat motoneurones studied in vitro.

Open access
Fulton, B P, Walton, K·1986·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

The electroresponsive properties of neonatal lumbar spinal motoneurones were studied using isolated, hemisected spinal cords from neonatal rats aged 3‐12 days. The extracellular and intracellular responses to electrical stimulation of the ventral and dorsal root were studied as well as the intracellular response to current injection. Field potentials recorded in the lateral motor area following electrical stimulation of lumbar ventral roots had a triphasic positive‐negative‐positive wave form. The negative component did not return to the base line smoothly but exhibited a 'shoulder' where the negativity increased in duration. Following electrical stimulation of the dorsal root, presynaptic field potentials were recorded upon activation of the afferent axons as well as following synaptic activation of interneurones and motoneurones. The input resistances of neonatal motoneurones determined from the slope of current‐voltage plots were high compared with the adult. The resistance decreased with age with a mean of 18.1 M omega for animals 3‐5 days old, 8.8 M omega for animals 6‐8 days old and 5.4 M omega for animals 9‐11 days old. Values for the membrane time constant were similar to those in the adult with a mean of 4.5 ms. Action potentials elicited by ventral or dorsal root stimulation or by intracellular current injection were marked by a pronounced after‐depolarization (a.d.p.) and an after‐hyperpolarization (a.h.p.). The amplitude of the a.h.p. varied with that of the a.d.p. The amplitude of excitatory post‐synaptic potentials (e.p.s.p.s) elicited by electrical stimulation of the dorsal root was affected by intracellular current injection. Two types of e.p.s.p.s were distinguished: those with a biphasic reversal (early phase first) and those in which the early phase was unaffected by inward current injection while the later phase was reversed. Unlike in the adult, the reversals could be achieved with low current levels and the amplitude of both types of e.p.s.p. was increased by inward current injection. Inhibitory post‐synaptic potentials (i.p.s.p.s) were elicited by dorsal or ventral root stimulation. The amplitude of these i.p.s.p.s was diminished and reversed in sign with inward current injection and their amplitude was enhanced with outward current injection. Activation of neonatal motoneurones with long current pulses revealed that there is one steady‐state firing range.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp015956

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 223

Metadata

Authors
Fulton, B. P., & Walton, K.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1986-01
Volume
370
Issue
1
Pages
651-678
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2100419984
Cited by
223
References
1
FWCI
3.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrophysiological properties of neonatal rat motoneurones studied in vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp015956
The paper
Fulton, B. P., & Walton, K. (1986). Electrophysiological properties of neonatal rat motoneurones studied in vitro. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp015956

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.