Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 319

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An after‐hyperpolarization of medium duration in rat hippocampal pyramidal cells.

Open access
Storm, J F·1989·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. In hippocampal pyramidal cells, action potentials are followed by three after‐hyperpolarizations (AHPs): a fast AHP (fAHP) lasting 2‐5 ms, a medium AHP (mAHP) lasting 50‐100 ms, and a slow AHP (sAHP) lasting more than 1 s. The mechanism underlying the mAHP was studied in CA1 cells (n = 46) in rat hippocampal slices, using injection of depolarizing current to elicit discharge. 2. The current underlying the mAHP was studied by single‐electrode voltage clamp in two ways. Either the voltage clamp was activated following a burst of spikes, thus recording the early tail current underlying the mAHP (hybrid clamp), or, after blocking the spikes with tetrodotoxin, the early tail current following a depolarizing voltage clamp command (to ‐20 to ‐45 mV for 100‐400 ms) was measured. In both cases, the early tail current (measured at ‐60 mV) showed the following characteristics: (a) it decayed exponentially with a time constant of about 50 ms; (b) it was substantially reduced by the muscarinic agonist carbachol (40‐50 microM); (c) it was moderately reduced (by 20% or less) by Ca2+‐free medium and Ca2+ channel blockers (Cd2+, Mn2+), which abolished the fAHP and the sAHP; (d) it was partly blocked by tetraethylammonium (TEA, 1‐10 mM) both before and during Ca2+ channel blockade; (e) it was resistant to noradrenaline (5‐10 microM), which blocked the sAHP, and to apamin (100 nM). 3. The mAHP itself, recorded under current clamp, showed properties corresponding to those of the early tail current. 4. Unlike the current underlying the sAHP, which was reduced and reversed by hyperpolarization, the early tail current appeared to be reduced only at potentials down to ‐80 mV, and to increase at more negative potentials. The early tail current and mAHP‐like undershoot at hyperpolarized potentials was blocked by external Cs+, but not by carbachol, in contrast to the early tail current and mAHP at ‐60 mV. 5. It was concluded that two currents contribute to the mAHP: IM (a voltage‐gated muscarine‐sensitive K+ current) and IC (a Ca2+‐dependent TEA‐sensitive K+ current). TEA reduced both the IM (5 mM) and the IC (1 mM) component of the mAHP. When the cell is hyperpolarized, a third current, IQ (a Ca+‐sensitive mixed Na+‐K+ inward current activated by hyperpolarization), masks the reversal of the mAHP by causing a depolarizing sag which resembles the decay of the mAHP.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1989.sp017491

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Metadata

Authors
Storm, J. F.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1989-02
Volume
409
Issue
1
Pages
171-190
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2109545010
Cited by
319
References
4
FWCI
3.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An after‐hyperpolarization of medium duration in rat hippocampal pyramidal cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1989.sp017491
The paper
Storm, J. F. (1989). An after‐hyperpolarization of medium duration in rat hippocampal pyramidal cells. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1989.sp017491

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.