Cited by 122Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsTreatment of Major Depression

Mechanisms underlying potentiation of synaptic transmission in rat anterior cingulate cortex in vitro.

Open access
Sah, P, Nicoll, R A·1991·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. The properties of the excitatory synapse made by callosal inputs onto layer V and layer VI cells in the anterior cingulate cortex were studied in an in vitro slice preparation with intracellular recording. 2. In the presence of picrotoxin, the excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) had two components, a fast component blocked by the non‐N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist 6‐cyano‐7‐nitroquinoxaline‐2,3‐dione (CNQX) and a slow component blocked by the NMDA receptor antagonist DL‐2‐amino‐5‐phosphonovalerate (APV). 3. Delivery of a brief tetanus to the afferent fibres led to a long‐term potentiation (LTP) of the initial slope of the monosynaptic EPSP. The LTP displayed the property of co‐operativity and could be blocked by APV or by buffering intracellular calcium. 4. Pairing of low frequency presynaptic activity or weak tetanic stimulation with postsynaptic depolarization failed to potentiate the EPSP. This suggests that postsynaptic depolarization alone is unable to explain the co‐operativity. 5. It is concluded that the transmitter mediating the excitatory input between callosal afferents and layer V and layer VI pyramidal neurones is glutamate. Tetanic stimulation of these afferents leads to LTP which shares many but not all the properties of LTP seen in the CA1 region of the hippocampus.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018446

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A common protocol to test the NMDAR/AMPAR ratio in response to the synaptic release of glutamate is to measure the ratio of the evoked excitatory postsynaptic current when the NMDAR is blocked by holding the cell at −70 mV to obtain a pure AMPAR component versus when the cell is held at +40 mV to get a mixed AMPAR + NMDAR component.

    “Therefore, a common protocol to test the NMDAR/AMPAR ratio in response to the synaptic release of glutamate is to measure the ratio of the evoked excitatory postsynaptic current when the NMDAR is blocked by holding the cell at −70 mV to obtain a pure AMPAR component versus when the cell is held at +40 mV to get a mixed AMPAR + NMDAR component (Figure 8d).22,23”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sah, P., & Nicoll, R. A.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1991-02
Volume
433
Issue
1
Pages
615-630
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2171347689
Cited by
122
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ns024205-07)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-38256, MH0437)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 24205)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
long-term potentiation, anterior cingulate cortex, layer 5 pyramidal neurons, NMDA receptor, glutamate, excitatory postsynaptic potentials, tetanic stimulation, calcium buffering, synaptic plasticity
MeSH terms
Animals, Corpus Callosum, Electric Stimulation, Electrophysiology, Gyrus Cinguli, Male, Neural Pathways, Synaptic Transmission, Picrotoxin, Quinoxalines, Synapses, 2-Amino-5-phosphonovalerate, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, 6-Cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione, Rats, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review