Mechanisms underlying potentiation of synaptic transmission in rat anterior cingulate cortex in vitro.
Open accessAbstract
1. The properties of the excitatory synapse made by callosal inputs onto layer V and layer VI cells in the anterior cingulate cortex were studied in an in vitro slice preparation with intracellular recording. 2. In the presence of picrotoxin, the excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) had two components, a fast component blocked by the non‐N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist 6‐cyano‐7‐nitroquinoxaline‐2,3‐dione (CNQX) and a slow component blocked by the NMDA receptor antagonist DL‐2‐amino‐5‐phosphonovalerate (APV). 3. Delivery of a brief tetanus to the afferent fibres led to a long‐term potentiation (LTP) of the initial slope of the monosynaptic EPSP. The LTP displayed the property of co‐operativity and could be blocked by APV or by buffering intracellular calcium. 4. Pairing of low frequency presynaptic activity or weak tetanic stimulation with postsynaptic depolarization failed to potentiate the EPSP. This suggests that postsynaptic depolarization alone is unable to explain the co‐operativity. 5. It is concluded that the transmitter mediating the excitatory input between callosal afferents and layer V and layer VI pyramidal neurones is glutamate. Tetanic stimulation of these afferents leads to LTP which shares many but not all the properties of LTP seen in the CA1 region of the hippocampus.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A common protocol to test the NMDAR/AMPAR ratio in response to the synaptic release of glutamate is to measure the ratio of the evoked excitatory postsynaptic current when the NMDAR is blocked by holding the cell at −70 mV to obtain a pure AMPAR component versus when the cell is held at +40 mV to get a mixed AMPAR + NMDAR component.
“Therefore, a common protocol to test the NMDAR/AMPAR ratio in response to the synaptic release of glutamate is to measure the ratio of the evoked excitatory postsynaptic current when the NMDAR is blocked by holding the cell at −70 mV to obtain a pure AMPAR component versus when the cell is held at +40 mV to get a mixed AMPAR + NMDAR component (Figure 8d).22,23”
From Lipid Nanoparticle Delivery of siRNA to Silence Neuronal Gene Expression in the Brain (2013) · cites this paper as [22]
Cites
Intracellular injections of EGTA block induction of hippocampal long-term potentiation
Lynch, G., Larson, J., Kelso, S., Barrionuevo, G., & Schottler, F. (1983) · Nature · doi:10.1038/305719a0 · Cited by 1,116 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Convergence of biological and psychological perspectives on cognitive coordination in schizophrenia
Phillips, W. A., & Silverstein, S. M. (2003) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x03000025 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Postsynaptic Induction and PKA-Dependent Expression of LTP in the Lateral Amygdala
Huang, Y.-Y., & Kandel, E. R. (1998) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80524-3 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Lipid Nanoparticle Delivery of siRNA to Silence Neuronal Gene Expression in the Brain
Rungta, R. L., Choi, H. B., Lin, P. J., Ko, R. W., Ashby, D., Nair, J., Manoharan, M., Cullis, P. R., & MacVicar, B. A. (2013) · Molecular Therapy—Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1038/mtna.2013.65 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Hensch, T. K., Gordon, J. A., Brandon, E. P., McKnight, G. S., Idzerda, R. L., & Stryker, M. P. (1998) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.18-06-02108.1998 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sah, P., & Nicoll, R. A.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-02
- Volume
- 433
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 615-630
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- PMC
- PMC1181391
- OpenAlex
- W2171347689
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01ns024205-07)
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH-38256, MH0437)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 24205)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Keywords
- long-term potentiation, anterior cingulate cortex, layer 5 pyramidal neurons, NMDA receptor, glutamate, excitatory postsynaptic potentials, tetanic stimulation, calcium buffering, synaptic plasticity
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Corpus Callosum, Electric Stimulation, Electrophysiology, Gyrus Cinguli, Male, Neural Pathways, Synaptic Transmission, Picrotoxin, Quinoxalines, Synapses, 2-Amino-5-phosphonovalerate, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, 6-Cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione, Rats, In Vitro Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review