Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 472

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dendritic glutamate receptor channels in rat hippocampal CA3 and CA1 pyramidal neurons.

Open access
Spruston, N, Jonas, P, Sakmann, B·1995·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. Properties of dendritic glutamate receptor (GluR) channels were investigated using fast application of glutamate to outside‐out membrane patches isolated from the apical dendrites of CA3 and CA1 pyramidal neurons in rat hippocampal slices. CA3 patches were formed (15‐76 microns from the soma) in the region of mossy fibre (MF) synapses, and CA1 patches (25‐174 microns from the soma) in the region of Schaffer collateral (SC) innervation. 2. Dual‐component responses consisting of a rapidly rising and decaying component followed by a second, substantially slower, component were elicited by 1 ms pulses of 1 mM glutamate in the presence of 10 microM glycine and absence of external Mg2+. The fast component was selectively blocked by 2‐5 microM 6‐cyano‐7‐nitroquinoxaline‐2,3‐dione (CNQX) and the slow component by 30 microM D‐2‐amino‐5‐phosphonopentanoic acid (D‐AP5), suggesting that the fast and slow components were mediated by the GluR channels of the L‐alpha‐amino‐3‐hydroxy‐5‐methyl‐4‐isoxazolepropionate (AMPA) and NMDA type, respectively. The peak amplitude ratio of the NMDA to AMPA receptor‐mediated components varied between 0.03 and 0.62 in patches from both CA3 and CA1 dendrites. Patches lacking either component were rarely observed. 3. The peak current‐voltage (I‐V) relationship of the fast component was almost linear, whereas the I‐V relationship of the slow component showed a region of negative slope in the presence of 1 mM external Mg2+. The reversal potential for both components was close to 0 mV. 4. Kainate‐preferring GluR channels did not contribute appreciably to the response to glutamate. The responses to 100 ms pulses of 1 mM glutamate were mimicked by application of 1 mM AMPA, whereas 1 mM kainate produced much smaller, weakly desensitizing currents. This suggests that the fast component is primarily mediated by the action of glutamate on AMPA‐preferring receptors. 5. The mean elementary conductance of AMPA receptor channels was about 10 pS, as estimated by non‐stationary fluctuation analysis. The permeability of these channels to Ca2+ was low (approximately 5% of the permeability to Cs+). 6. The elementary conductance of NMDA receptor channels was larger, with a main conductance state of about 45 pS. These channels were 3.6 times more permeable to Ca2+ than to Cs+.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020521

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Cited by

See all 472

Metadata

Authors
Spruston, N., Jonas, P., & Sakmann, B.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-01-15
Volume
482
Issue
2
Pages
325-352
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W1996456984
Cited by
472
References
53
FWCI
12.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dendritic glutamate receptor channels in rat hippocampal CA3 and CA1 pyramidal neurons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020521
The paper
Spruston, N., Jonas, P., & Sakmann, B. (1995). Dendritic glutamate receptor channels in rat hippocampal CA3 and CA1 pyramidal neurons. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020521

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.