The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The motor cortex drives the muscles during walking in human subjects
Open accessAbstract
Key points It is often assumed that automatic movements such as walking require little conscious attention and it has therefore been argued that these movements require little cortical control. In humans, however, the gait function is often heavily impaired or completely lost following cortical lesions such as stroke. In this study we investigated synchrony between cortical signals recorded with electroencephalography (EEG) and electromyographic signals (EMG activity) recorded from the tibialis anterior muscle (TA) during walking. We found evidence of synchrony in the frequency domain (coherence) between the primary motor cortex and the TA muscle indicating a cortical involvement in human gait function. This finding underpins the importance of restoration of the activity and connectivity between the motor cortex and the spinal cord in the recovery of gait function in patients with damage of the central nervous system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 · Cited by 24,371
Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation
Jung, T., Makeig, S., Humphries, C., Lee, T.-W., McKeown, M. J., Iragui, V. J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2000) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1017/s0048577200980259 · Cited by 3,334
Stam, C. J., Nolte, G., & Daffertshofer, A. (2007) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20346 · Cited by 2,018
Identifying true brain interaction from EEG data using the imaginary part of coherency
Nolte, G., Bai, O., Wheaton, L., Mari, Z., Vorbach, S., & Hallett, M. (2004) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2004.04.029 · Cited by 1,756
Halliday, D. M., Rosenberg, J. R., Amjad, A. M., Breeze, P., Conway, B. A., & Farmer, S. F. (1995) · Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0079-6107(96)00009-0 · Cited by 1,107
Self-citationConway, B. A., Halliday, D. M., Farmer, S. F., Shahani, U., Maas, P., Weir, A. I., & Rosenberg, J. R. (1995) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp021104 · Cited by 924
Self-citationCortical Mapping of Gait in Humans: A Near-Infrared Spectroscopic Topography Study
Miyai, I., Tanabe, H. C., Sase, I., Eda, H., Oda, I., Konishi, I., Tsunazawa, Y., Suzuki, T., Yanagida, T., & Kubota, K. (2001) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0905 · Cited by 788
Coherent oscillations in monkey motor cortex and hand muscle EMG show task‐dependent modulation
Baker, S. N., Olivier, E., & Lemon, R. N. (1997) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.1997.225bo.x · Cited by 666
The role of synchrony and oscillations in the motor output
Baker, S. N., Kilner, J. M., Pinches, E. M., & Lemon, R. N. (1999) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s002210050825 · Cited by 419
Human Cortical Muscle Coherence Is Directly Related to Specific Motor Parameters
Kilner, J. M., Baker, S. N., Salenius, S., Hari, R., & Lemon, R. N. (2000) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.20-23-08838.2000 · Cited by 418
Cited by
Clark, D. J. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00246 · Cited by 441
The neural mechanisms of manual dexterity
Sobinov, A. R., & Bensmaia, S. J. (2021) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-021-00528-7 · Cited by 248
Metadata
- Authors
- Petersen, T. H., Willerslev‐Olsen, M., Conway, B. A., & Nielsen, J. B.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-05-15
- Volume
- 590
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2443-2452
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W1531808741
- Cited by
- 358
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 12.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
