The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In-Vivo Measurement of Dynamic Joint Motion Using High Speed Biplane Radiography and CT: Application to Canine ACL Deficiency
Abstract
Dynamic assessment of three-dimensional (3D) skeletal kinematics is essential for understanding normal joint function as well as the effects of injury or disease. This paper presents a novel technique for measuring in-vivo skeletal kinematics that combines data collected from high-speed biplane radiography and static computed tomography (CT). The goals of the present study were to demonstrate that highly precise measurements can be obtained during dynamic movement studies employing high frame-rate biplane video-radiography, to develop a method for expressing joint kinematics in an anatomically relevant coordinate system and to demonstrate the application of this technique by calculating canine tibio-femoral kinematics during dynamic motion. The method consists of four components: the generation and acquisition of high frame rate biplane radiographs, identification and 3D tracking of implanted bone markers, CT-based coordinate system determination, and kinematic analysis routines for determining joint motion in anatomically based coordinates. Results from dynamic tracking of markers inserted in a phantom object showed the system bias was insignificant (−0.02 mm). The average precision in tracking implanted markers in-vivo was 0.064 mm for the distance between markers and 0.31° for the angles between markers. Across-trial standard deviations for tibio-femoral translations were similar for all three motion directions, averaging 0.14 mm (range 0.08 to 0.20 mm). Variability in tibio-femoral rotations was more dependent on rotation axis, with across-trial standard deviations averaging 1.71° for flexion/extension, 0.90° for internal/external rotation, and 0.40° for varus/valgus rotation. Advantages of this technique over traditional motion analysis methods include the elimination of skin motion artifacts, improved tracking precision and the ability to present results in a consistent anatomical reference frame.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Abnormal Rotational Knee Motion during Running after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Tashman, S., Collon, D., Anderson, K., Kolowich, P., & Anderst, W. (2004) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546503261709 · Cited by 722
Self-citationDynamic Function of the ACL-reconstructed Knee during Running
Tashman, S., Kolowich, P., Collon, D., Anderson, K., & Anderst, W. (2007) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/blo.0b013e31802bab3e · Cited by 323
Self-citationBey, M. J., Zauel, R., Brock, S. K., & Tashman, S. (2006) · Journal of Biomechanical Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.2206199 · Cited by 300
Self-citationFregly, B. J., Rahman, H. A., & Banks, S. A. (2005) · Journal of Biomechanical Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.1933949 · Cited by 155
Abbas, W., & Masip Rodo, D. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19153274 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Tashman, S., & Anderst, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
- Publisher
- ASME International
- Published
- 2003-04-01
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 238-245
- ISSN
- 0148-0731 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-8951
- OpenAlex
- W2120362239
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In-Vivo Measurement of Dynamic Joint Motion Using High Speed Biplane Radiography and CT: Application to Canine ACL Deficiency. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1115/1.1559896
- The paper
- Tashman, S., & Anderst, W. (2003). In-Vivo Measurement of Dynamic Joint Motion Using High Speed Biplane Radiography and CT: Application to Canine ACL Deficiency. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1559896
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.