Cited by 326Tactile and Sensory InteractionsElasticity and Material ModelingAdhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions

3-D finite-element models of human and monkey fingertips to investigate the mechanics of tactile sense

Dandekar, Kiran, Raju, Balasundar I., Srinivasan, Mandayam A.·2003·Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

Abstract

The biomechanics of skin and underlying tissues plays a fundamental role in the human sense of touch. It governs the mechanics of contact between the skin and an object, the transmission of the mechanical signals through the skin, and their transduction into neural signals by the mechanoreceptors. To better understand the mechanics of touch, it is necessary to establish quantitative relationships between the loads imposed on the skin by an object, the state of stresses/strains at mechanoreceptor locations, and the resulting neural response. Towards this goal, 3-D finite-element models of human and monkey fingertips with realistic external geometries were developed. By computing fingertip model deformations under line loads, it was shown that a multi-layered model was necessary to match previously obtained in vivo data on skin surface displacements. An optimal ratio of elastic moduli of the layers was determined through numerical experiments whose results were matched with empirical data. Numerical values of the elastic moduli of the skin layers were obtained by matching computed results with empirically determined force-displacement relationships for a variety of indentors. Finally, as an example of the relevance of the model to the study of tactile neural response, the multilayered 3-D finite-element model was shown to be able to predict the responses of the slowly adapting type I (SA-I) mechanoreceptors to indentations by complex object shapes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1115/1.1613673

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dandekar, K., Raju, B. I., & Srinivasan, M. A.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
Published
2003-10-01
Volume
125
Issue
5
Pages
682-691
ISSN
  • 0148-0731 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-8951
OpenAlex
W2137256122
Cited by
326
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 21
FWCI
4.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS33778, R01NS033778)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Elasticity and Material Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
Keywords
tactile sense, skin biomechanics, mechanoreceptors, skin indentation, load-displacement curve, three-dimensional finite element model
MeSH terms
Animals, Computer Simulation, Elasticity, Fingers, Humans, Macaca fascicularis, Mechanoreceptors, Models, Biological, Neurons, Afferent, Pressure, Skin, Skin Physiological Phenomena, Touch, Weight-Bearing, Finite Element Analysis, Mechanotransduction, Cellular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review