Cited by 117Tactile and Sensory InteractionsMotor Control and AdaptationNeural dynamics and brain function

The effect of surface wave propagation on neural responses to vibration in primate glabrous skin

Open access
Manfredi, Louise R., Baker, Andrew T., Elias, Damian O., Dammann, John F., Zielinski, Mark C., Polashock, Vicky S., Bensmaia, Sliman J.·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Because tactile perception relies on the response of large populations of receptors distributed across the skin, we seek to characterize how a mechanical deformation of the skin at one location affects the skin at another. To this end, we introduce a novel non-contact method to characterize the surface waves produced in the skin under a variety of stimulation conditions. Specifically, we deliver vibrations to the fingertip using a vibratory actuator and measure, using a laser Doppler vibrometer, the surface waves at different distances from the locus of stimulation. First, we show that a vibration applied to the fingertip travels at least the length of the finger and that the rate at which it decays is dependent on stimulus frequency. Furthermore, the resonant frequency of the skin matches the frequency at which a subpopulation of afferents, namely Pacinian afferents, is most sensitive. We show that this skin resonance can lead to a two-fold increase in the strength of the response of a simulated afferent population. Second, the rate at which vibrations propagate across the skin is dependent on the stimulus frequency and plateaus at 7 m/s. The resulting delay in neural activation across locations does not substantially blur the temporal patterning in simulated populations of afferents for frequencies less than 200 Hz, which has important implications about how vibratory frequency is encoded in the responses of somatosensory neurons. Third, we show that, despite the dependence of decay rate and propagation speed on frequency, the waveform of a complex vibration is well preserved as it travels across the skin. Our results suggest, then, that the propagation of surface waves promotes the encoding of spectrally complex vibrations as the entire neural population is exposed to essentially the same stimulus. We also discuss the implications of our results for biomechanical models of the skin.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0031203

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During texture scanning, high-frequency skin oscillations are elicited in the skin that can travel the entire length of the finger and as far away as the wrist.

    “During texture scanning, high-frequency skin oscillations are elicited in the skin (Manfredi et al., 2014) that can travel the entire length of the finger (Manfredi et al., 2012) and as far away as the wrist (Delhaye et al., 2012).”

    From Biomimetic approaches to bionic touch through a peripheral nerve interface (2015) · cites this paper as Manfredi et al., 2012

  • Sophisticated models that simulate different aspects of transduction do exist.

    “Indeed, sophisticated models that simulate different aspects of transduction do exist.”

    From Biomimetic approaches to bionic touch through a peripheral nerve interface (2015) · cites this paper as Manfredi et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [35]Dong Y 2010 Analysis and parameter estimation of spiking neuronal systems [dissertation] Baltimore, MD Johns Hopkins University

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Manfredi, L. R., Baker, A. T., Elias, D. O., Dammann, J. F., Zielinski, M. C., Polashock, V. S., & Bensmaia, S. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Kimberly-Clark (United States) (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-02-13
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
e31203
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075063639
Cited by
117
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Knowledge@UChicago (University of Chicago) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Chicago (cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
surface wave propagation, skin vibration, tactile perception, glabrous skin, fingertip, laser Doppler vibrometry, somatosensory neurons, skin biomechanics
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Hand, Humans, Mechanoreceptors, Neurons, Afferent, Physical Stimulation, Primates, Skin, Vibration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review