Convective Transport in Nanofluids
Abstract
Nanofluids are engineered colloids made of a base fluid and nanoparticles (1-100nm). Nanofluids have higher thermal conductivity and single-phase heat transfer coefficients than their base fluids. In particular, the heat transfer coefficient increases appear to go beyond the mere thermal-conductivity effect, and cannot be predicted by traditional pure-fluid correlations such as Dittus-Boelter’s. In the nanofluid literature this behavior is generally attributed to thermal dispersion and intensified turbulence, brought about by nanoparticle motion. To test the validity of this assumption, we have considered seven slip mechanisms that can produce a relative velocity between the nanoparticles and the base fluid. These are inertia, Brownian diffusion, thermophoresis, diffusiophoresis, Magnus effect, fluid drainage, and gravity. We concluded that, of these seven, only Brownian diffusion and thermophoresis are important slip mechanisms in nanofluids. Based on this finding, we developed a two-component four-equation nonhomogeneous equilibrium model for mass, momentum, and heat transport in nanofluids. A nondimensional analysis of the equations suggests that energy transfer by nanoparticle dispersion is negligible, and thus cannot explain the abnormal heat transfer coefficient increases. Furthermore, a comparison of the nanoparticle and turbulent eddy time and length scales clearly indicates that the nanoparticles move homogeneously with the fluid in the presence of turbulent eddies, so an effect on turbulence intensity is also doubtful. Thus, we propose an alternative explanation for the abnormal heat transfer coefficient increases: the nanofluid properties may vary significantly within the boundary layer because of the effect of the temperature gradient and thermophoresis. For a heated fluid, these effects can result in a significant decrease of viscosity within the boundary layer, thus leading to heat transfer enhancement. A correlation structure that captures these effects is proposed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A two-phase model including Brownian diffusion, thermophoresis diffusion, and sedimentation is more suitable for multi-cycle simulations.
“On the other hand, a more advanced two-phase model taking into account the Brownian diffusion and thermophoresis diffusion slip mechanisms as originally proposed by Buongiorno45, then further improved for numerical stability by Riahi et al.48, and upgraded by Amidu et al.47 to also include nanoparticles sedimentation effects, would be more suitable for such multi-cycle simulations.”
From A critical assessment of nanoparticles enhanced phase change materials (NePCMs) for latent heat energy storage applications (2023) · cites this paper as [45]
The single-phase model has been demonstrated to lack the ability to predict the correct magnitude of heat transfer enhancement, particularly for nanoparticle concentrations higher than 1%.
“In fact, this model (single-phase model) has been demonstrated45–47 to lack the ability to predict the correct magnitude of the heat transfer enhancement, particularly, for nanoparticle concentrations higher than 1%.”
From A critical assessment of nanoparticles enhanced phase change materials (NePCMs) for latent heat energy storage applications (2023) · cites this paper as [45]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chieruzzi, M., Cerritelli, G. F., Miliozzi, A., & Kenny, J. M. (2013) · Nanoscale Research Letters · doi:10.1186/1556-276x-8-448 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Nitrate salts doped with CuO nanoparticles for thermal energy storage with improved heat transfer
Myers, P. D., Alam, T. E., Kamal, R., Goswami, D. Y., & Stefanakos, E. (2016) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.11.045 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Chieruzzi, M., Miliozzi, A., Crescenzi, T., Torre, L., & Kenny, J. M. (2015) · Nanoscale Research Letters · doi:10.1186/s11671-015-0984-2 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Amidu, M. A., Ali, M., Alkaabi, A. K., & Addad, Y. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-34907-0 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Michael Joseph Stalin, P., Arjunan, T. V., Matheswaran, M. M., & Sadanandam, N. (2019) · Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry · doi:10.1007/s10973-017-6865-4 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
- Authors
- Buongiorno, J.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Buongiorno, J.
- ORCID
- Buongiorno, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Heat Transfer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-08-15
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 240-250
- ISSN
- 0022-1481 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-8943
- OpenAlex
- W2035685097
- Cited by
- 7,013
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 340 · 2025: 436 · 2024: 586 · 2023: 682 · 2022: 682 · 2021: 653 · 2020: 560 · 2019: 527 · 2018: 427 · 2017: 450 · 2016: 407 · 2015: 341 · 2014: 263 · 2013: 221 · 2012: 159
- FWCI
- 14.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Optimization
- Keywords
- nanofluids, convective heat transfer, heat transfer coefficient enhancement, slip mechanism, Brownian diffusion, thermophoresis, nanoparticle dispersion, thermal dispersion, turbulent eddies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review