Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,105

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

FEBio: Finite Elements for Biomechanics

Open access
Maas, Steve A., Ellis, Benjamin J., Ateshian, Gerard A., Weiss, Jeffrey A.·2012·Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

Abstract

In the field of computational biomechanics, investigators have primarily used commercial software that is neither geared toward biological applications nor sufficiently flexible to follow the latest developments in the field. This lack of a tailored software environment has hampered research progress, as well as dissemination of models and results. To address these issues, we developed the FEBio software suite (http://mrl.sci.utah.edu/software/febio), a nonlinear implicit finite element (FE) framework, designed specifically for analysis in computational solid biomechanics. This paper provides an overview of the theoretical basis of FEBio and its main features. FEBio offers modeling scenarios, constitutive models, and boundary conditions, which are relevant to numerous applications in biomechanics. The open-source FEBio software is written in C++, with particular attention to scalar and parallel performance on modern computer architectures. Software verification is a large part of the development and maintenance of FEBio, and to demonstrate the general approach, the description and results of several problems from the FEBio Verification Suite are presented and compared to analytical solutions or results from other established and verified FE codes. An additional simulation is described that illustrates the application of FEBio to a research problem in biomechanics. Together with the pre- and postprocessing software PREVIEW and POSTVIEW, FEBio provides a tailored solution for research and development in computational biomechanics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1115/1.4005694

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Anderson, Subject-Specific Finite Element Model of the Pelvis: Development, Validation and Sensitivity Studies, J. Biomech. Eng., 127, 364, 10.1115/1.1894148 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Spilker, Morphometry-Based Impedance Boundary Conditions for Patient-Specific Modeling of Blood Flow in Pulmonary Arteries, Ann. Biomed. Eng., 35, 546, 10.1007/s10439-006-9240-3 · DOI
  3. Wang, Imaging of 3D Cardiac Electrical Activity: A Model-Based Recovery Framework, Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv., 9, 792, 10.1007/11866565_97 · DOI
  4. Speelman, Effects of Wall Calcifications in Patient-Specific Wall Stress Analyses of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms, J. Biomech. Eng., 129, 105, 10.1115/1.2401189 · DOI
  5. Portnoy, Real-Time Patient-Specific Finite Element Analysis of Internal Stresses in the Soft Tissues of a Residual Limb: A New Tool for Prosthetic Fitting, Ann. Biomed. Eng., 35, 120, 10.1007/s10439-006-9208-3 · DOI
  6. Schmid-Schonbein, Transport Processes in Biomedical Systems: A Roadmap for Future Research Directions, Ann. Biomed. Eng., 33, 1136, 10.1007/s10439-005-5633-y · DOI
  7. Crawford, Quantitative Computed Tomography-Based Finite Element Models of the Human Lumbar Vertebral Body: Effect of Element Size on Stiffness, Damage, and Fracture Strength Predictions, J. Biomech. Eng., 125, 434, 10.1115/1.1589772 · DOI
  8. Li, Arthroscopic Evaluation of Cartilage Degeneration Using Indentation Testing—Influence of Indenter Geometry, Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon), 21, 420, 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.12.010 · DOI
  9. Li, Electromechanical Response of Articular Cartilage in Indentation—Considerations on the Determination of Cartilage Properties During Arthroscopy, Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng., 8, 83, 10.1080/10255840500167895 · DOI
  10. Davids, A Finite Element Analysis of Endothelial Shear Stress for Pulsatile Blood Flow, Biorheology, 11, 137, 10.3233/BIR-1974-11205 · DOI
  11. Doyle, Finite Deformation Analysis of the Relaxed and Contracted Dog Carotid Artery, Microvasc. Res., 3, 400, 10.1016/0026-2862(71)90042-2 · DOI
  12. Janz, Finite-Element Model for the Mechanical Behavior of the Left Ventricle. Prediction of Deformation in the Potassium-Arrested Rat Heart, Circ. Res., 30, 244, 10.1161/01.RES.30.2.244 · DOI
  13. Matthews, Finite Element Displacement Analysis of a Lung, J. Biomech., 5, 591, 10.1016/0021-9290(72)90031-0 · DOI
  14. Farah, Photoelastic and Finite Element Stress Analysis of a Restored Axisymmetric First Molar, J. Biomech., 6, 511, 10.1016/0021-9290(73)90009-2 · DOI
  15. Belytschko, Finite Element Stress Analysis of an Intervertebral Disc, J. Biomech., 7, 277, 10.1016/0021-9290(74)90019-0 · DOI
  16. Anderson, Verification, Validation and Sensitivity Studies in Computational Biomechanics, Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng., 10, 171, 10.1080/10255840601160484 · DOI
  17. Henninger, Validation of Computational Models in Biomechanics, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H, J. Eng. Med., 224, 801, 10.1243/09544119JEIM649 · DOI
  18. Babuska, Verification and Validation in Computational Engineering and Science: Basic Concepts, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 193, 4057, 10.1016/j.cma.2004.03.002 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Matthies, The Solution of Nonlinear Finite Element Equations, Int. J. Num. Methods Eng., 14, 1613, 10.1002/nme.v14:11 · DOI
  20. Bonet, Nonlinear Continuum Mechanics for Finite Element Analysis, 10.1017/CBO9780511755446 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Simo, Quasi-Incompressible Finite Elasticity in Principal Stretches: Continuum Basis and Numerical Algorithms, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 85, 273, 10.1016/0045-7825(91)90100-K · DOI
  22. Puso, A Stabilized Nodally Integrated Tetrahedral, Int. J. Num. Methods Eng., 67, 841, 10.1002/nme.v67:6 · DOI
  23. Betsch, A 4-Node Finite Shell Element for the Implementation of General Hyperelastic 3D-Elasticity at Finite Strains, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 130, 57, 10.1016/0045-7825(95)00920-5 · DOI
  24. Mow, Biphasic Creep and Stress Relaxation of Articular Cartilage in Compression: Theory and Experiments, J. Biomech. Eng., 102, 73, 10.1115/1.3138202 · DOI
  25. Ateshian, Equivalence Between Short-Time Biphasic and Incompressible Elastic Material Response, J. Biomech. Eng., 129, 405, 10.1115/1.2720918 · DOI
  26. Ateshian, Finite Element Algorithm for Frictionless Contact of Porous Permeable Media Under Finite Deformation and Sliding, J. Biomech. Eng., 132, 061006, 10.1115/1.4001034 · DOI
  27. Laursen, Augmented Lagrangian Quasi-Newton Solver for Constrained Nonlinear Finite Element Applications, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 38, 3571, 10.1002/nme.v38:21 · DOI
  28. Maker, B. N. , 1995, “Rigid Bodies for Metal Forming Analysis With NIKE3D,” University of California, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Report No. UCRL-JC-119862, pp. 1–8.
  29. Schenk, On Fast Factorization Pivoting Methods for Symmetric Indefinite Systems, Elect. Trans. Numer. Anal., 23, 158
  30. Demmel, A Supernodal Approach to Sparse Partial Pivoting, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., 20, 720, 10.1137/S0895479895291765 · DOI
  31. Veldhuizen, Will C++ be Faster than FORTRAN? Scientific Computing in Object-Oriented Parallel Environments, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 1343, 49, 10.1007/3-540-63827-X_43 · DOI
  32. Maker, B. N. , 1995, “NIKE3D: A Nonlinear, Implicit, Three-Dimensional Finite Element Code for Solid and Structural Mechanics,” Lawrence Livermore Laboratory Technical Report No. UCRL-MA-105268. · DOI
  33. Park, Cartilage Interstitial Fluid Load Support in Unconfined Compression, J. Biomech., 36, 1785, 10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00231-8 · DOI
  34. Ogden, Non-Linear Elastic Deformations
  35. Erdemir, An Inverse Finite-Element Model of Heel-Pad Indentation, J. Biomech., 39, 1279, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.03.007 · DOI
  36. Ateshian, Finite Deformation Biphasic Material Properties of Bovine Articular Cartilage From Confined Compression Experiments, J. Biomech., 30, 1157, 10.1016/S0021-9290(97)85606-0 · DOI
  37. Holmes, Finite Deformation of Soft Tissue: Analysis of a Mixture Model in Uni-Axial Compression, J. Biomech. Eng., 108, 372, 10.1115/1.3138633 · DOI
  38. Armstrong, An Analysis of the Unconfined Compression of Articular Cartilage, J. Biomech. Eng., 106, 165, 10.1115/1.3138475 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Oden, Finite Elements of Nonlinear Continua
  40. Treloar, Stress-Strain Data for Vulcanised Rubber Under Various Types of Deformation, Trans. Faraday Soc., 40, 59, 10.1039/tf9444000059 · DOI
  41. Bisshopp, Large Deflection of Cantilever Beams, Q. Appl. Math., 3, 272, 10.1090/qam/13360 · DOI
  42. Batoz, An Explicit Formulation for an Efficient Triangular Plate Bending Element, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 18, 1077, 10.1002/nme.v18:7 · DOI
  43. Moore, The Glenohumeral Capsule Should be Evaluated as a Sheet of Fibrous Tissue: A Validated Finite Element Model, Ann. Biomed. Eng., 38, 66, 10.1007/s10439-009-9834-7 · DOI
  44. Drury, Finding Consistent Strain Distributions in the Glenohumeral Capsule Between Two Subjects: Implications for Physical Examinations, J. Biomech., 44, 607, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.11.018 · DOI

Cited by

See all 1,105

Metadata

Authors
Maas, S. A., Ellis, B. J., Ateshian, G. A., & Weiss, J. A.
Venue
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
Published
2012-01-01
Volume
134
Issue
1
Pages
011005-011005
ISSN
  • 0148-0731 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-8951
OpenAlex
W2017950984
Cited by
1,105
References
3
FWCI
26.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FEBio: Finite Elements for Biomechanics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1115/1.4005694
The paper
Maas, S. A., Ellis, B. J., Ateshian, G. A., & Weiss, J. A. (2012). FEBio: Finite Elements for Biomechanics. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4005694

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.