Cited by 3Thermography and Photoacoustic TechniquesThermal properties of materialsThermoelastic and Magnetoelastic Phenomena

Dynamics of surface thermal expansion and diffusivity using two-color reflection transient gratings:

Open access
Pennington, Deanna M., Harris, Charles B.·1993·SPIE Proceedings

Abstract

We report ultrafast measurements of the dynamic thermal expansion of a surface and the temperature dependent surface thermal diffusivity using a two-color reflection transient grating technique. Studies were performed on p-type, n-type, and undoped GaAs(100) samples at several temperatures. Using a 75 fs ultraviolet probe with visible excitation beams, the electronic effects that dominate single color experiments become negligible; thus surface expansion due to heating and the subsequent contraction caused by cooling provide the dominant influence on the diffracted probe. The diffracted signal was composed of two components, thermal expansion of the surface and heat flow away from the surface, allowing the determination of the rate of expansion as well as the surface thermal diffusivity. At room temperature a signal rise due to thermal expansion was observed, corresponding to a maximum average displacement of approximately equals 1 angstroms at 32 ps. Large fringe spacings were used, thus the dominant contributions to the signal were expansion and diffusion perpendicular to the surface. Values for the surface thermal diffusivity of GaAs were measured and found to be in reasonable agreement with bulk values above 50 degree(s)K. Below 50 degree(s)K, the diffusivity at the surface was more than an order of magnitude slower than in the bulk due to increased phonon boundary scattering. Comparison of the results with a straightforward thermal model yields good agreement over a range of temperatures (12 - 300 degree(s)K). The applicability and advantages of the transient grating technique for studying photothermal and photoacoustic phenomena are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1117/12.147607

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pennington, D. M., & Harris, C. B.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
SPIE Proceedings
Publisher
SPIE
Published
1993-06-24
Volume
1856
Pages
106-118
ISSN
0277-786X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2028849226
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
2.33
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE (publishedVersion)
  • University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal properties of materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Thermoelastic and Magnetoelastic Phenomena
Keywords
GaAs(100), phonon boundary scattering, temperature-dependent diffusivity, heat flow, photothermal phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review