Cited by 27Advancements in Photolithography TechniquesAdvanced optical system designAdvanced X-ray Imaging Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mask 3D effects and compensation for high NA EUV lithography

Abstract

Mask shadow compensation for EUV lithography has typically been performed using simple rule-based schemes during optical proximity correction (OPC). However, as feature sizes decrease, the required corrections get more complex as they become dependent on both feature size and type. Thus, OPC models that account for these 3D mask effects are becoming essential. These models become even more important for higher numerical aperture EUV systems due to larger angles of incidence on the mask and tighter process budgets for CD and overlay. This paper will focus on estimating these 3D mask effects and evaluate the extendibility of current available OPC models for some specific higher numerical aperture EUV systems. It is concluded that the current available 3D mask models are capturing the primary effects and it is believed that with further refinement they are likely extendable to meet the needs of future high-NA tools. Additionally, a combination of thinner mask absorber, tighter scanner focus control and/or larger optical magnification will likely be required to print sub-30nm pitch structures with higher numerical aperture EUV systems.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1117/12.2011643

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 27

Metadata

Authors
Raghunathan, S., McIntyre, G., Fenger, G., & Wood, O.
Affiliations
  • GlobalFoundries (United States) (US)
  • IBM (United States) (US)
Venue
SPIE Proceedings
Publisher
SPIE
Published
2013-04-01
Volume
8679
Pages
867918
ISSN
0277-786X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055095265
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.25
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Photolithography Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced optical system design
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
Keywords
EUV lithography, high numerical aperture, optical proximity correction, optical magnification, critical dimension control, overlay control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review