The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Lithographic performance of high-numerical-aperture (NA=0.3) EUV small-field exposure tool (HINA)
Abstract
Three sets of projection optics (Sets 1, 2, and 3) were fabricated to the mark of a wave front error (WFE) of less than 1 nm. The RMS WFE is 7.5 nm for Set 1, 1.9 nm for Set 2, and at most 0.9 nm for Set 3. In addition, the RMS mid-spatial frequency roughness (MSFR), which affects flare, is 0.34 nm for Set 2 and 0.17 nm for Set 3. This paper discusses the current lithographic performance of HINA, especially the evaluation of flare and the replication of fine-pitch patterns. Several EUV masks were fabricated to evaluate the effects of flare and to replicate fine-pitch patterns. In the case of Set 2 optics, 90 nm lines and spaces were barely delineated using a bright-field mask due to the RMS MSFR of 0.34 nm, and replication of 70 nm lines and spaces were achieved using a dark-field mask. Since the RMS WFE and the RMS MSFR for Set 3 optics are half as much as that for Set 2 optics, the lithographic performance of HINA is markedly improved. 50 nm lines and spaces of non-chemically-amplified resist were delineated with the illumination condition of a partial coherence, σ, of 0.8 and 45 nm lines and spaces were delineated with the annular illumination condition of outer σ of 0.8 and inner σ of 0.5. In addition ultimate resolution of 30 nm lines and spaces of chemically-amplified resist was performed under the coherent illumination condition of σ of 0.0.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Extreme ultraviolet lithography: A review
Wu, B., & Kumar, A. (2007) · Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Processing Measurement and Phenomena · doi:10.1116/1.2794048 · Cited by 413
Evolution in Lithography Techniques: Microlithography to Nanolithography
Sharma, E., Rathi, R., Misharwal, J., Sinhmar, B., Kumari, S., Dalal, J., & Kumar, A. (2022) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano12162754 · Cited by 257
Extreme ultraviolet lithography
Kazazis, D., Santaclara, J. G., van Schoot, J., Mochi, I., & Ekinci, Y. (2024) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-024-00361-z · Cited by 149
“Several research lithography tools have been introduced to progress EUVL and develop EUVL scanners and photoresists for HVM. Micro-exposure tools 40–43 operate with a similar concept to a scanner, whereas alpha tools are production-like tools used for research and development 44 .”
Characterization of extreme ultraviolet resists with interference lithography
Gronheid, R., Solak, H. H., Ekinci, Y., Jouve, A., & Roey, F. V. (2006) · Microelectronic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.mee.2006.01.149 · Cited by 55
Naulleau, P. P., Anderson, C. N., Chiu, J., et al. (2009) · Microelectronic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.mee.2009.03.013 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Oizumi, H., Tanaka, Y., Kumasaka, F., Nishiyama, I., Kondo, H., Shiraishi, M., Oshino, T., Sugisaki, K., & Murakami, K.
- Affiliations
- Association of Super-Advanced Electronics (JP)
- Nikon (Japan) (JP)
- Venue
- SPIE Proceedings
- Publisher
- SPIE
- Published
- 2005-05-06
- Volume
- 5751
- Pages
- 102
- ISSN
- 0277-786X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049338386
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 14.30
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Photolithography Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced optical system design
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
- Keywords
- EUV lithography, Hina, wavefront error, flares, EUV masks, annular illumination, coherent illumination, chemically amplified resists, non-chemically amplified resist
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lithographic performance of high-numerical-aperture (NA=0.3) EUV small-field exposure tool (HINA). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1117/12.599435
- The paper
- Oizumi, H., Tanaka, Y., Kumasaka, F., Nishiyama, I., Kondo, H., Shiraishi, M., Oshino, T., Sugisaki, K., & Murakami, K. (2005). Lithographic performance of high-numerical-aperture (NA=0.3) EUV small-field exposure tool (HINA). SPIE Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.599435