Cited by 17Advanced X-ray Imaging TechniquesAdvanced optical system designAstronomy and Astrophysical Research

Design And Assembly Of A High Resolution Schwarzschild Microscope For Soft X Rays:

Lovas, I., Santy, W., Spiller, E., Tibbetts, R., Wilczynski, J.·1982·SPIE Proceedings

Abstract

Recently developed multilayer coatings permit use of normal incidence optics for soft x-rays promising a resolution that should be substantially better than that obtained with grazing incidence optics. We describe the design and assembly of a Schwarzschild objective for a scanning x-ray microscope. The Schwarzschild objective, consisting of two nearly concentric spherical mirrors promises diffraction-limited resolution for soft x-rays.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1117/12.933138

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lovas, I., Santy, W., Spiller, E., Tibbetts, R., & Wilczynski, J.
Affiliations
IBM (United States) (US)
Venue
SPIE Proceedings
Publisher
SPIE
Published
1982-03-24
Volume
0316
Pages
90-99
ISSN
0277-786X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2022499046
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.34
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced optical system design
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Keywords
Schwarzschild objective, soft X-ray microscopy, multilayer coatings, normal incidence optics, diffraction-limited resolution, X-ray optics design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review