Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 475

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A method for the reconstruction of four‐dimensional synchronized CT scans acquired during free breathing

Low, Daniel A., Nystrom, Michelle, Kalinin, Eugene, Parikh, Parag, Dempsey, James F., Bradley, Jeffrey D., Mutic, Sasa, Wahab, Sasha H., Islam, Tareque, Christensen, Gary, Politte, David G., Whiting, Bruce R.·2003·Medical Physics

Abstract

Breathing motion is a significant source of error in radiotherapy treatment planning for the thorax and upper abdomen. Accounting for breathing motion has a profound effect on the size of conformal radiation portals employed in these sites. Breathing motion also causes artifacts and distortions in treatment planning computed tomography (CT) scans acquired during free breathing and also causes a breakdown of the assumption of the superposition of radiation portals in intensity‐modulated radiation therapy, possibly leading to significant dose delivery errors. Proposed voluntary and involuntary breath‐hold techniques have the potential for reducing or eliminating the effects of breathing motion, however, they are limited in practice, by the fact that many lung cancer patients cannot tolerate holding their breath. We present an alternative solution to accounting for breathing motion in radiotherapy treatment planning, where multislice CT scans are collected simultaneously with digital spirometry over many free breathing cycles to create a four‐dimensional (4‐D) image set, where tidal lung volume is the additional dimension. An analysis of this 4‐D data leads to methods for digital‐spirometry, based elimination or accounting of breathing motion artifacts in radiotherapy treatment planning for free breathing patients. The 4‐D image set is generated by sorting free‐breathing multislice CT scans according to user‐defined tidal‐volume bins. A multislice CT scanner is operated in the ciné mode, acquiring 15 scans per couch position, while the patient undergoes simultaneous digital‐spirometry measurements. The spirometry is used to retrospectively sort the CT scans by their correlated tidal lung volume within the patient's normal breathing cycle. This method has been prototyped using data from three lung cancer patients. The actual tidal lung volumes agreed with the specified bin volumes within standard deviations ranging between 22 and 33 An analysis of sagittal and coronal images demonstrated relatively small (<1 cm) motion artifacts along the diaphragm, even for tidal volumes where the rate of breathing motion is greatest. While still under development, this technology has the potential for revolutionizing the radiotherapy treatment planning for the thorax and upper abdomen.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1118/1.1576230

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 475

Metadata

Authors
Low, D. A., Nystrom, M., Kalinin, E., Parikh, P., Dempsey, J. F., Bradley, J. D., Mutic, S., Wahab, S. H., Islam, T., Christensen, G., Politte, D. G., & Whiting, B. R.
Venue
Medical Physics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-05-30
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
1254-1263
ISSN
  • 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
  • 2473-4209
OpenAlex
W2133025770
Cited by
475
References
0
FWCI
32.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A method for the reconstruction of four‐dimensional synchronized CT scans acquired during free breathing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1118/1.1576230
The paper
Low, D. A., Nystrom, M., Kalinin, E., Parikh, P., Dempsey, J. F., Bradley, J. D., Mutic, S., Wahab, S. H., Islam, T., Christensen, G., Politte, D. G., & Whiting, B. R. (2003). A method for the reconstruction of four‐dimensional synchronized CT scans acquired during free breathing. Medical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1576230

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.