The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Automated three‐dimensional registration of magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography brain images by multiresolution optimization of voxel similarity measures
Abstract
Approaches using measures of voxel intensity similarity are showing promise in fully automating magnetic resonance (MR) and positron emission tomography (PET) image registration in the head, without requiring extraction and identification of corresponding structures. In this paper a method of multiresolution optimization of these measures is described and five alternative measures are compared: cross correlation, minimization of corresponding PET intensity variation, moments of the distribution of values in the intensity feature space, entropy of the intensity feature space and mutual information. Their ability to recover registration is examined for ten clinically acquired image pairs with respect to the size of initial misregistration, the precision of the final result, and the accuracy assessed by visual inspection. The mutual information measure proved the most robust to initial starting estimate, successfully registering 98.8% of 900 trial misregistrations. Success is defined as providing a visually acceptable solution to a trained observer. A high resolution search ( mm step size) of 30 trial misregistrations showed that optimization using the mutual information measure provided solutions with 0.13 mm, 0.11 mm and 0.17 mm standard deviations in the three Cartesian axes of the translation vector and 0.2°, 0.3° and 0.2° standard deviations for rotations about the three axes. The algorithm takes between 4 and 8 minutes to run on a typical workstation, including visual inspection of the result.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast mr images
Rueckert, D., Sonoda, L. I., Hayes, C., Hill, D. L. G., Leach, M. O., & Hawkes, D. J. (1999) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.796284 · Cited by 5,265
Self-citationA reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration
Avants, B. B., Tustison, N. J., Song, G., Cook, P. A., Klein, A., & Gee, J. C. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.025 · Cited by 4,796
Hill, D. L. G., Batchelor, P. G., Holden, M., & Hawkes, D. J. (2001) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/46/3/201 · Cited by 2,093
Self-citationVirtual in vivo interactive dissection of white matter fasciculi in the human brain
Catani, M., Howard, R. J., Pajevic, S., & Jones, D. K. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1136 · Cited by 1,637
In vivo imaging of microglial activation with [11C](R)-PK11195 PET in idiopathic Parkinson's disease
Gerhard, A., Pavese, N., Hotton, G., Turkheimer, F., Es, M., Hammers, A., Eggert, K., Oertel, W., Banati, R. B., & Brooks, D. J. (2006) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2005.08.002 · Cited by 1,200
Metadata
- Authors
- Studholme, C., Hill, D. L. G., & Hawkes, D. J.
- Venue
- Medical Physics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-35
- ISSN
- 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
- 2473-4209
- OpenAlex
- W1991622227
- Cited by
- 675
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 35.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automated three‐dimensional registration of magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography brain images by multiresolution optimization of voxel similarity measures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1118/1.598130
- The paper
- Studholme, C., Hill, D. L. G., & Hawkes, D. J. (1997). Automated three‐dimensional registration of magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography brain images by multiresolution optimization of voxel similarity measures. Medical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.598130
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.