The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generalized multi‐dimensional adaptive filtering for conventional and spiral single‐slice, multi‐slice, and cone‐beam CT
Abstract
In modern computed tomography (CT) there is a strong desire to reduce patient dose and/or to improve image quality by increasing spatial resolution and decreasing image noise. These are conflicting demands since increasing resolution at a constant noise level or decreasing noise at a constant resolution level implies a higher demand on x‐ray power and an increase of patient dose. X‐ray tube power is limited due to technical reasons. We therefore developed a generalized multi‐dimensional adaptive filtering approach that applies nonlinear filters in up to three dimensions in the raw data domain. This new method differs from approaches in the literature since our nonlinear filters are applied not only in the detector row direction but also in the view and in the z‐direction. This true three‐dimensional filtering improves the quantum statistics of a measured projection value proportional to the third power of the filter size. Resolution tradeoffs are shared among these three dimensions and thus are considerably smaller as compared to one‐dimensional smoothing approaches. Patient data of spiral and sequential single‐ and multi‐slice CT scans as well as simulated spiral cone‐beam data were processed to evaluate these new approaches. Image quality was assessed by evaluation of difference images, by measuring the image noise and the noise reduction, and by calculating the image resolution using point spread functions. The use of generalized adaptive filters helps to reduce image noise or, alternatively, patient dose. Image noise structures, typically along the direction of the highest attenuation, are effectively reduced. Noise reduction values of typically 30%–60% can be achieved in noncylindrical body regions like the shoulder. The loss in image resolution remains below 5% for all cases. In addition, the new method has a great potential to reduce metal artifacts, e.g., in the hip region.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. II. Phantom measurements
Kalender, W. A., Wolf, H., & Suess, C. (1999) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.598738 · Cited by 345
Self-citationDose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. I. Simulation studies
Gies, M., Kalender, W. A., Wolf, H., Suess, C., & Madsen, M. T. (1999) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.598779 · Cited by 306
Self-citationKalender, W. A., Wolf, H., Suess, C., Gies, M., Greess, H., & Bautz, W. A. (1999) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s003300050674 · Cited by 245
Self-citationA PC program for estimating organ dose and effective dose values in computed tomography
Kalender, W. A., Schmidt, B., Zankl, M., & Schmidt, M. (1999) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s003300050709 · Cited by 231
Self-citationMarom, E. M., McAdams, H. P., Palmer, S. M., Erasmus, J. J., Sporn, T. A., Tapson, V. F., Davis, R. D., & Goodman, P. C. (1999) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.213.1.r99oc12283 · Cited by 31
Nonlinear filters applied on computerized axial tomography: Theory and phantom images
Keselbrener, L., Shimoni, Y., & AKSELROD, S. (1992) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.596824 · Cited by 27
Cited by
Artifacts in CT: Recognition and Avoidance
Barrett, J. F., & Keat, N. (2004) · RadioGraphics · doi:10.1148/rg.246045065 · Cited by 1,688
Strategies for CT Radiation Dose Optimization
Kalra, M. K., Maher, M. M., Toth, T. L., Hamberg, L. M., Blake, M. A., Shepard, J.-A., & Saini, S. (2004) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2303021726 · Cited by 1,080
Wang, J., Li, T., Lu, H., & Liang, Z. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2006.882141 · Cited by 533
Projection space denoising with bilateral filtering and CT noise modeling for dose reduction in CT
Manduca, A., Yu, L., Trzasko, J. D., Khaylova, N., Kofler, J. M., McCollough, C. M., & Fletcher, J. G. (2009) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.3232004 · Cited by 360
Metadata
- Authors
- Kachelrieß, M., Watzke, O., & Kalender, W. A.
- Venue
- Medical Physics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 475-490
- ISSN
- 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
- 2473-4209
- OpenAlex
- W1992705935
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 10.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generalized multi‐dimensional adaptive filtering for conventional and spiral single‐slice, multi‐slice, and cone‐beam CT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1118/1.1358303
- The paper
- Kachelrieß, M., Watzke, O., & Kalender, W. A. (2001). Generalized multi‐dimensional adaptive filtering for conventional and spiral single‐slice, multi‐slice, and cone‐beam CT. Medical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1358303
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.