Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 311

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Generalized multi‐dimensional adaptive filtering for conventional and spiral single‐slice, multi‐slice, and cone‐beam CT

Kachelrieß, Marc, Watzke, Oliver, Kalender, Willi A.·2001·Medical Physics

Abstract

In modern computed tomography (CT) there is a strong desire to reduce patient dose and/or to improve image quality by increasing spatial resolution and decreasing image noise. These are conflicting demands since increasing resolution at a constant noise level or decreasing noise at a constant resolution level implies a higher demand on x‐ray power and an increase of patient dose. X‐ray tube power is limited due to technical reasons. We therefore developed a generalized multi‐dimensional adaptive filtering approach that applies nonlinear filters in up to three dimensions in the raw data domain. This new method differs from approaches in the literature since our nonlinear filters are applied not only in the detector row direction but also in the view and in the z‐direction. This true three‐dimensional filtering improves the quantum statistics of a measured projection value proportional to the third power of the filter size. Resolution tradeoffs are shared among these three dimensions and thus are considerably smaller as compared to one‐dimensional smoothing approaches. Patient data of spiral and sequential single‐ and multi‐slice CT scans as well as simulated spiral cone‐beam data were processed to evaluate these new approaches. Image quality was assessed by evaluation of difference images, by measuring the image noise and the noise reduction, and by calculating the image resolution using point spread functions. The use of generalized adaptive filters helps to reduce image noise or, alternatively, patient dose. Image noise structures, typically along the direction of the highest attenuation, are effectively reduced. Noise reduction values of typically 30%–60% can be achieved in noncylindrical body regions like the shoulder. The loss in image resolution remains below 5% for all cases. In addition, the new method has a great potential to reduce metal artifacts, e.g., in the hip region.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1118/1.1358303

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 311

Metadata

Authors
Kachelrieß, M., Watzke, O., & Kalender, W. A.
Venue
Medical Physics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-04
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
475-490
ISSN
  • 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
  • 2473-4209
OpenAlex
W1992705935
Cited by
311
References
6
FWCI
10.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generalized multi‐dimensional adaptive filtering for conventional and spiral single‐slice, multi‐slice, and cone‐beam CT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1118/1.1358303
The paper
Kachelrieß, M., Watzke, O., & Kalender, W. A. (2001). Generalized multi‐dimensional adaptive filtering for conventional and spiral single‐slice, multi‐slice, and cone‐beam CT. Medical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1358303

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.