The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Student expectations in introductory physics
Abstract
Students’ understanding of what science is about, how it is done, and their expectations as to what goes on in a science course, can play a powerful role in what they get out of introductory college physics. In this paper, we describe the Maryland Physics Expectations survey; a 34-item Likert-scale (agree–disagree) survey that probes student attitudes, beliefs, and assumptions about physics. We report on the results of pre- and post-instruction delivery of this survey to 1500 students in introductory calculus-based physics at six colleges and universities. We note a large gap between the expectations of experts and novices and observe a tendency for student expectations to deteriorate rather than improve as a result of the first term of introductory calculus-based physics.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Student attitudes are being assessed with the Maryland Physics Expectations II survey (Redish et al., 1998), a well-validated instrument that has been modified to include a set of questions (referred to as the interdisciplinary cluster) that specifically probes whether students feel interdisciplinary approaches are a valuable problem-solving tool for the biological sciences.”
From Competency-Based Reforms of the Undergraduate Biology Curriculum: Integrating the Physical and Biological Sciences (2013) · cites this paper as Redish et al., 1998
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 694
Cwik, S., & Singh, C. (2022) · Physics Education Research Conference (PERC) · doi:10.1119/perc.2022.pr.cwik · Cited by 2
“The items for different motivational beliefs including self-efficacy were adapted from previously validated surveys [15,29,33-36] and re-validated in our own context using one-on-one student interviews (to ensure that students interpreted the survey items correctly), Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), Confirmatory Fac…”
MethodJahanifar, M. (2022) · School Science and Mathematics · doi:10.1111/ssm.12559 · Cited by 3
Kortemeyer, G., Kortemeyer, C., & Bauer, W. (2023) · Physical Review Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.19.020148 · Cited by 3
Comparing Group and Individual Problem Solving : A Case Study from Newtonian Mechanics
Berge, M., & Adawi, T. (2012) · Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology) · Cited by 2
Promoting High Quality Teaching Practices in Higher Education: Lessons Learned from the USA
Henderson, C., Beach, A. L., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2012) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137023032_5 · Cited by 2
Student Expectations, Classroom Community, and Values Reported on Group Exams
Carr, E. T., Sault, T. M., & Wolf, S. F. (2019) · Physics Education Research Conference (PERC) · doi:10.1119/perc.2018.pr.carr · Cited by 2
Challenges in teaching and learning physics for first year students
Chrzanowski, J. B., BIEG, B., & Kravtsov, Y. S. (2013) · Zeszyty Naukowe / Akademia Morska w Szczecinie · Cited by 2
Christensen, W. M. (2007) · doi:10.31274/rtd-180813-17144 · Cited by 2
Personal epistemological growth in a college chemistry laboratory environment
Keen-Rocha, L. (2008) · Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · Cited by 2
Stecklein, J. J. (2014) · doi:10.17077/etd.kedc3ovl · Cited by 2
“Since student expectations and beliefs about science affect learning (Redish et al., 1998; Shanin, 2009), measures of student expectations and beliefs were also considered.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialNew Themes and Audiences for the Physics of Music
Gibson, G. N., & Johnston, I. (2002) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.1457264 · Cited by 2
Elliott, L. A. (2007) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.2742403 · Cited by 2
More than Just "Plug-and-Chug": Exploring How Physics Students Make Sense with Equations.
Kuo, E. (2013) · The Physics Video Demonstration Database (Cornell University) · Cited by 5
Assessing the Effectiveness of Studio Physics at Georgia State University
Upton, B. (2022) · The Physics Video Demonstration Database (Cornell University) · doi:10.57709/1465954 · Cited by 2
Lessons From the Physics-Education Reform EffortPreprint
Hake, R. R. (2001) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.physics/0106087 · Cited by 2
“This and the poor showing on the pre/post MPEX test of student understanding of the nature of science and education [47] indicate that more work needs to be done to improve IE methods.”
BackgroundMethodKienhues, D. (2013) · doi:10.1093/obo/9780199756810-0084 · Cited by 4
Gender differences in undergraduate students' performance, perception and participation in physics
Donnelly, R. (2014) · ERA · Cited by 2
Combining Different Teaching Methods to Teach Physics Topics: Using Creative Drama and 7E Model
Şahin, E., & Yaǵbasan, R. (2021) · Pamukkale University Journal of Education · doi:10.9779/pauefd.787276 · Cited by 1
Percepci´on del aprendizaje de la f´ısica en diferentes programas de ingenier´ıa
Crespo, T. R., Hernández, Ó., Rueda-Delgado, D., et al. (2022) · Revista Mexicana de Física E · doi:10.31349/revmexfise.19.020202 · Cited by 1
“Existen muchos estudios en los que se ha indagado sobre las epistemologı́as estudiantiles en el aprendizaje de la Fı́sica; entre estos, Maryland Physics Expectation MPEX [14], Views About Science Survey VASS [15], Epistemological Beliefs Assessment about Physical Science EBAPS [16], Colorado Learning Attitudes about S…”
BackgroundQualitative Methods in Physics Education Research
Otero, V. K., Harlow, D. B., & Meltzer, D. E. (2023) · doi:10.1063/9780735425514_025 · Cited by 2
Epistemic Beliefs and Physics Teacher Education
Zemplén, G. Á. (2023) · doi:10.1063/9780735425514_011 · Cited by 2
What Physics Instructors Can Learn from Astronomy Teaching
Good, M. L., Mason, A. J., & Singh, C. (2023) · The Physics Teacher · doi:10.1119/5.0074117 · Cited by 1
Purwanti, P., Mayanty, S., Fitrian, A., et al. (2024) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2866/1/012100 · Cited by 1
“Understanding physics requires the ability to grasp the meaning and significance of a physics concept [5].”
Smith, E. N., Helwig, J., Hendren, K., Huk, J. M., & Gordon, V. D. (2025) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/5.0070669 · Cited by 1
Development and Evaluation of Decision-Based Laboratories for Non-Science Majors
Robbins, M., & Burkholder, E. W. (2025) · The Physics Teacher · doi:10.1119/5.0179162 · Cited by 1
Grundy, L. S., & Koretsky, M. (2025) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.70035 · Cited by 3
“Researchers have also suggested that epistemological beliefs, such as those investigated in the previously mentioned studies, ought to be conceived of as metacognitive (Barzilai & Zohar, 2014; Hofer, 2004; Mason & Bromme, 2010; Redish et al., 1998; Richter & Schmid, 2010).”
Predictors of exam scores in physics through the lens of academic misalignment
Scharlach, S. C. (2026) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-026-01238-x · Cited by 1
“Redish et al. [22] demonstrated that experts in physics think about the field differently from novices.”
False understanding in AI-assisted physics problem solving: a theoretical framework
Balta, N. (2026) · European Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6404/ae68a7 · Cited by 1
Las concepciones epistemológicas de los profesores universitarios de química
Mateos, M., García, M. B., & Vilanova, S. L. (2018) · Educación Química · doi:10.22201/fq.18708404e.2007.2.65964 · Cited by 1
Freshmen and Physics teacher expectations in learning physics
Kritsadatana, N., & Wattanakasiwich, P. (2011) · Proceedings of The Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education (formerly UniServe Science Conference) · Cited by 1
How engineering students describe three-dimensional forces
Miller-Young, J. E. (2010) · Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) · doi:10.24908/pceea.v0i0.3119 · Cited by 1
“[12] showed that student attitudes and expectations that “memorizing equations is important” and “any numbers a student needs will always be given to them” can actually increase as a result of traditional instruction in introductory physics for engineers.”
BackgroundA MODEL FOR MEASURING THE QUALITY OF A MATHEMATICS QUESTION
Huntley, B., Engelbrecht, J., & Harding, A. (2010) · Far East Journal of Mathematical Education · doi:10.17654/0973563110026 · Cited by 1
Ross, R. S., Venugopal, E., Maggio, D., et al. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--5731 · Cited by 1
Ha, S., Cheong, Y. W., Byun, T., & Lee, G. (2009) · Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education · Cited by 1
Gönen, S. (2014) · Science education international · Cited by 1
Nason, J. A., Brooks, B. J., & Koretsky, M. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--18303 · Cited by 1
Arróyave, R., Radović, M., & Froyd, J. E. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--21267 · Cited by 1
Bringing the "Two Cultures" Together through "A World of Light and Color".
Mian, S. I., Marx, J. D., & Pagonis, V. (2008) · Forum on public policy · Cited by 1
An assessment of the students’ attitudes toward engineering design and build projects
Tartibu, L. K., & Steenkamp, R. (2020) · doi:10.1109/weef-gedc49885.2020.9293642 · Cited by 1
“The concept of “favourable/unfavourable) plot was based on the Maryland Physics Expectations (MPEX) survey [10].”
MethodSuárez, Á., Baccino, D., Monteiro, M., et al. (2021) · Enseñanza de la Física · doi:10.36411/aef.3.1.4 · Cited by 1
Analyzing pre-instruction math knowledge and its correlation with introductory physics exam results
Popanao, M., Smith, M. F., & Pairor, P. (2023) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2431/1/012026 · Cited by 1
Ouellette, E., Lewsirirat, S., Sebastian, R. B., et al. (2023) · Physics Education Research Conference (PERC) · doi:10.1119/perc.2023.pr.ouellette · Cited by 1
“This epistemological view of learning fits with the epistemological category "independence in learning physics" [1, 2].”
BackgroundUndergraduate students’ expectations of practical work in university physics
Dunnett, K. (2024) · Högre utbildning · doi:10.23865/hu.v14.6457 · Cited by 1
“…of the codes in the experience of being in laboratories category (first letter X), would be assigned ‘affect’ in Kalender et al. (2021), or ‘effort’ in Redish et al. (1998), while those grouped under the laboratory environment (first letter E), would belong to either the ‘equip-ment’ or…”
Murphy, C. E. (2011) · DigitalCommons (California Polytechnic State University) · Cited by 1
Interactive Engagement in Upper-Division Physics
Pollock, S. J. (2014) · Change The Magazine of Higher Learning · doi:10.1080/00091383.2014.905425 · Cited by 1
Tales From The Wave Front: Teaching The Physics Of Cell Phones And Wireless Communications
Ross, R. S., & Ross, J. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--3439 · Cited by 1
Crash Safety in the Introductory Physics Lab
Ludwigsen, D. O., Brelin-Fornari, J., & Neal, J. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--17670 · Cited by 1
Galczynski, M. (2016) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/p.26871 · Cited by 1
Souter, N. J., & Findlay, M. (2008) · Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) · Cited by 1
Persson, J. R. (2017) · Uniped · doi:10.18261/issn.1893-8981-2017-04-06 · Cited by 1
Understanding Authentic Learning
Lasry, N. (2008) · VDM Verlag Dr. Müller eBooks · Cited by 1
The RC circuit with an Olympic twist
Oliveira, F., & Paixão, J. A. (2019) · Physics Education · doi:10.1088/1361-6552/ab02bd · Cited by 1
The relationship between students’ views and performance of solving physics problems
Sirait, J., Hamdani, H., & Mursyid, S. (2019) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1171/1/012008 · Cited by 1
High speed video technique analysis of an object moving on an inclined plane
Chomphutong, S., Luksameevanish, V., & Poonyawatpornkul, J. (2018) · Warasan Witthayasat Mahawitthayalai Naresuan · Cited by 1
FEN BİLİMLERİ MOTİVASYON ÖLÇEĞİ II’NİN TÜRKÇE’YE VE FİZİĞE UYARLANMASI: FİZİK MOTİVASYON ÖLÇEĞİ
Süzük, E. (2019) · Anadolu Öğretmen Dergisi · doi:10.35346/aod.626185 · Cited by 1
An Empirical Study on the Science Education Students' Learning Attitude on Science
Zhang, H., & Jia, Y. (2020) · Research in Education Assessment and Learning · doi:10.37906/real.2020.2 · Cited by 1
فر, م. ج. (2021) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · doi:10.22059/japr.2021.302274.643515 · Cited by 1
Student Conceptions of Expertise.
Bertram, C. A., Leak, A. E., Sayre, E. C., et al. (2016) · Digital Commons-DePaul (DePaul University) · Cited by 1
Workshop Physics: An Activity-Based Curriculum Enhanced by Computer Tools
Fu, C., & Feng, X. (2021) · Science Journal of Education · doi:10.11648/j.sjedu.20210903.17 · Cited by 1
“Maryland Physics Expectations Survey (MPEX) [36] Probing students’ attitudes, epistemological beliefs and assumptions about physics”
BackgroundRadović, M., & Arróyave, R. (2021) · doi:10.18260/1-2-620-38641 · Cited by 1
Teaching physics in Romania: new requirements call for new methods
Constantinescu, R. D., Stoenescu, G., & Petrişor, I. (2003) · European Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/0143-0807/24/5/309 · Cited by 1
Investigation of the effect of ranking tasks of student understanding of key astronomy topics
Hudgins, D. W. (2009) · Unisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa) · Cited by 1
Khwanda, M. N. (2009) · Unisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa) · Cited by 1
Cahyadi, V., & Butler, P. H. (2005) · Cited by 1
Implementing Reflective Writing in Combination with Labatorials
Sobhanzadeh, M. (2015) · doi:10.5072/prism/26471 · Cited by 1
Self-efficacy state experiences in introductory physics: With implications for gender in physics
Nissen, J. (2016) · ProQuest Demo Repository · Cited by 1
Diversity in Physics Education Research: A Decade of Inclusion and Future ChallengesPreprint
Frazer, L. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.07863 · Cited by 1
Coalson, E., Feldman, A., & Krusberg, Z. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 1
An Investigation of the Effectiveness of Physics First in Maine
O’Brien, M. J. (2006) · DigitalCommons (California Polytechnic State University)
Argüelles, J., Perillán, C., & Núñez, P. (2015) · FEM Revista de la Fundación Educación Médica · doi:10.4321/s2014-98322015000500004
Embedding research principles into multimedia teaching and learning tools
Kuan, N. C. H., Sharma, M. D., Lindstrøm, C., et al. (2012) · Proceedings of The Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education (formerly UniServe Science Conference)
Explanatory Cohrence in the Context of the Second Law of Thermodynamics
Geller, B. D. (2014) · University Libraries (University of Maryland) · doi:10.13016/m2hw4s
Epistemic Impact on Group Problem Solving for Different Science MajorsPreprint
Mason, A. J., & Bertram, C. A. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.08666
Student goals and expectations in a large-enrollment physical science class
Rebello, N. S. (2004) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/1.1807285
Writing Science Fiction Stories to Motivate Analysis of Journal ArticlesPreprint
Kontur, F. J. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1403.2435
Effect of a Concentrated In-service Elementary Teacher Force and Motion Workshop
Nelson, D. A. (2006)
Qualitative Understanding of Magnetism at Three Levels of Expertise
Stefani, F., & Marshall, J. A. (2008) · Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library)
Lab-Tutorials for teaching quantum physics (Lab-Tutorials fuer den Quantenphysik Unterricht)Preprint
Wittmann, M. C. (2006) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.physics/0604112
“Lab-Tutorials für den Quantenphysik Unterricht – Wittmann s. 10 von 10 accepted for publication in Praxis der Naturwissenschaften – Physik.”
BackgroundInfluentialUso de vectores en su propio contexto: parte II
García, S. F., Quezada, M. G., Avena, L. L. A., et al. (2015) · CULCyT: Cultura Científica y Tecnológica
Li, X. (2013) · Aquila Digital Community (University of Southern Mississippi)
Attracting and retaining science students.
Dedic, H., Rosenfield, S., Rosenfield, E., & Jungert, T. (2010) · Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government)
Kaistha, S. (2013) · Shodhgangotri
Role and value of quantitative instruments in gauging student perspectives in a computing curriculum
Walker, H. M., Erkan, A. S., Guzdial, M., et al. (2011) · ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) · doi:10.1145/1953163.1953261
“Our work involved the adaptation of the Maryland Physics Expectations Survey (MPEX) instrument [1, 2] and its use in a number of introductory and intermediate courses.”
MethodThe Real Prize Inside: Learning About Science and Spectra from Cereal Boxes
Kustusch, M. B., Gaffney, J. D. H., & Beichner, R. J. (2009) · The Physics Teacher · doi:10.1119/1.3225508
Rethinking pedagogy and curriculum in post‐secondary science education
van Aalst, J. (2004) · Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education · doi:10.1080/14926150409556610
Robert A. Millikan Award Lecture (July 2001): Can “descriptive” end with “A”?
Watkins, S. A. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1469039
The Five Stage Cycle Model: An Integrated Approach to Teaching Physics
Alarfaj, M. M. (2011) · International Education Studies · doi:10.5539/ies.v4n3p166
How Do Education Students Learn Physics
Mistades, V. M. (2011)
Evaluating Factors Contributing to Engineering Technology Students' Introductory Physics Experience
Reed, D. A. (2007) · DigitalCommons (California Polytechnic State University)
Improving Student Learning and Views of Physics in a Large Enrollment Introductory Physics Class
Shan, K. J. (2013) · OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)
Redish, E. F. (2013)
Self-citationContinuing the Comparison Between Graphical- and Text-based Programming Instruction
Harper, K., Freuler, R. J., Demel, J. T., et al. (2013)
Article Longitudinal Study of Student Attitudes in a Biology Program
Hansen, M. J. (2013)
Harold Washington College Assessment Committee 2008 Gen Education Natural Science Assessment Report
Marín, L., Millán, J., Kabir, C., et al. (2009)
Can We Influence How Students View Physics
Wetterer, A. M. (2015)
Expanding our understanding of students' use of graphs for learning physics
Laverty, J. T. (2013) · doi:10.25335/m5m37b
Austin, C. W. (2008) · SHAREOK (University of Oklahoma; Oklahoma State University; Central Oklahoma University)
Ross, M. J. (2013) · ProQuest LLC eBooks
Metadata
- Authors
- Redish, E. F., Saul, J. M., & Steinberg, R. N.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Physics
- Published
- 1998-03-01
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 212-224
- ISSN
- 0002-9505 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2909
- OpenAlex
- W2061925588
- Cited by
- 693
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 47.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Physics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Science Education and Perceptions
- Keywords
- student expectations, introductory physics, student attitudes toward science, calculus-based physics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
