Social Stratification in Science

Cole, Jonathan R., Cole, Stephen, deB. Beaver, Donald·1974·American Journal of Physics

DOI 10.1119/1.1987897

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1119/1.1987897

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Toward a new economics of science
Partha, D., & David, P. A. (1994) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(94)01002-1 · Cited by 2,448
Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments
DiPrete, T. A., & Eirich, G. M. (2006) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.123127 · Cited by 2,069
What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior
Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. (2008) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/00220410810844150 · Cited by 1,607
Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again
Peters, D. P., & Ceci, S. J. (1982) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00011183 · Cited by 1,079
Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system
Mahoney, M. J. (1977) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/bf01173636 · Cited by 1,013
Education, Age, and the Cumulative Advantage in Health
Ross, C. E., & Wu, C.-L. (1996) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2137234 · Cited by 828
The Matthew effect in science funding
Bol, T., de Vaan, M., & van de Rijt, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1719557115 · Cited by 638
The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation
Cicchetti, D. V. (1991) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00065675 · Cited by 496
Scientific Careers: Universalism and Particularism
Long, J. S., & Fox, M. F. (1995) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.so.21.080195.000401 · Cited by 486
Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial
Davis, P. M., Lewenstein, B. V., Simon, D. H., Booth, J. G., & Connolly, M. J. L. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.a568 · Cited by 419
What causes a management article to be cited? Article, author or journal?
Judge, T. A., Cable, D. M., Colbert, A. E., & Rynes, S. L. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.25525577 · Cited by 402
Not by Productivity Alone: How Visibility and Specialization Contribute to Academic Earnings
Leahey, E. (2007) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240707200403 · Cited by 356
Normative versus Social Constructivist Processes in the Allocation of Citations: A Network-Analytic Model
Baldi, S. (1998) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2657504 · Cited by 335
Psychotherapy practice and research: Repairing a strained alliance.
Goldfried, M. R., & Wolfe, B. E. (1996) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.51.10.1007 · Cited by 271
The Use of Bibliometrics for Assessing Research: Possibilities, Limitations and Adverse Effects
Haustein, S., & Larivière, V. (2015) · Incentives and Performance · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09785-5_8 · Cited by 276
Creative thought as blind-variation and selective-retention: Combinatorial models of exceptional creativity
Simonton, D. K. (2010) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2010.02.002 · Cited by 261
On the shoulders of Robert Merton: Towards a normative theory of citation
Small, H. (2004) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1023/b:scie.0000027310.68393.bc · Cited by 183
Why expert performance is special and cannot be extrapolated from studies of performance in the general population: a response to criticisms.
Ericsson, K. A. (2014) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2013.12.001 · Cited by 178
Co-citation, bibliographic coupling and leading authors, institutions and countries in the 50 years of Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Mas-Tur, A., Roig-Tierno, N., Sarin, S., Haon, C., Sego, T., Belkhouja, M., Porter, A., & Merigó, J. M. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120487 · Cited by 147
How the publish-or-perish principle divides a science: the case of economists
van Dalen, H. P. (2021) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03786-x · Cited by 128
Peer Review for Journals as it Stands Today—Part 2
CAMPANARIO, J. M. (1998) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547098019004002 · Cited by 132
To what extent is inclusion in the Web of Science an indicator of journal ‘quality’?
Chavarro, D., Ràfols, I., & Tang, P. (2018) · Research Evaluation · doi:10.1093/reseval/rvy001 · Cited by 115
Achievement and Ascriptive Processes in the Recognition of Scientific Articles
Stewart, J. A. (1983) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/62.1.166 · Cited by 110
Unraveling scientific impact: Citation types in marketing journals
Stremersch, S., Camacho, N., Vanneste, S., & Verniers, I. (2015) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2014.09.004 · Cited by 102
Why has Latour's theory of citations been ignored by the bibliometric community? Discussion of sociological interpretations of citation analysis
Luukkonen, T. (1997) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/bf02461121 · Cited by 94
Revisiting the Scientometric Conceptualization of Impact and Its Measurement
Abramo, G. (2018) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2018.05.001 · Cited by 80
Reward, persuasion, and the Sokal Hoax: A study in citation identities
White, H. D. (2004) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1023/b:scie.0000027313.91401.9b · Cited by 80
Individual Differences in Faculty Research Time Allocations Across 13 Countries
Bentley, P. J., & Kyvik, S. (2013) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-012-9273-4 · Cited by 72
Peer Review versus Bibliometrics: Which Method Better Predicts the Scholarly Impact of Publications?
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Reale, E. (2019) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03184-y · Cited by 50
The geography of references in elite articles: Which countries contribute to the archives of knowledge?
Bornmann, L., Wagner, C., & Leydesdorff, L. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0194805 · Cited by 39

Authors: Cole, J. R., Cole, S., & deB. Beaver, D.
Venue: American Journal of Physics
Publisher: American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT)
Published: 1974-10-01
Volume: 42
Issue: 10
Pages: 923-924
ISSN: 0002-9505 (ISSN-L)
1943-2909
DOI: 10.1119/1.1987897
OpenAlex: W2167651468
Cited by: 1,135
References: 0
FWCI: 73.88
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review