The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Contour, Interval, and Pitch Recognition in Memory for Melodies
Abstract
Melodic contour (the sequence of ups and downs in a melody, regardless of interval size) expresses those aspects of a melody that are most essential to manipulation of that melody in various musical structures, e.g., folktunes and fugues. This is demonstrated by brief analyses of actual music. Two experiments demonstrate the role of melodic contour recognition in memory for melodies. Experiment 1 (2×3 factorial design) involved short-term memory with comparison melodies either transposed or not transposed from the key of the standard. Separate groups had the tasks of distinguishing (a) between same and different melodies; (b) between same melodies and ones with only the same contour; and (c) between melodies with the same contour and different ones. The effects of transposition and task and their interaction were significant (p<0.001). Untransposed melodies were recognized by their exact pitches, so that tasks (a) and (b) were equally easy. Contour recognition was more important with transposed melodies, so that task (b) was very difficult, and tasks (a) and (c) were easier. Task (c) was about equally difficult under both conditions. Experiment 2 involved recognition of distorted versions of familiar folktunes having the same length and rhythmic structure. In ascending order of recognizability, these distortions preserved merely the harmonic basis of the melody, the melodic contour, and the contour plus the relative sizes of successive intervals between notes (chi-square = 50.4, p<0.001).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Brain Organization for Music Processing
Peretz, I., & Zatorre, R. J. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070225 · Cited by 863
Scale and contour: Two components of a theory of memory for melodies.
Dowling, W. J. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.85.4.341 · Cited by 678
Self-citationBee, M. A., & Micheyl, C. (2008) · Journal of Comparative Psychology · doi:10.1037/0735-7036.122.3.235 · Cited by 347
Auditory imagery: Empirical findings
Hubbard, T. L. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0018436 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Dowling, W. J., & Fujitani, D. S.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1971-02-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 2B
- Pages
- 524-531
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2124840093
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contour, Interval, and Pitch Recognition in Memory for Melodies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.1912382
- The paper
- Dowling, W. J., & Fujitani, D. S. (1971). Contour, Interval, and Pitch Recognition in Memory for Melodies. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1912382
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.