The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Production and perception of clear speech in Croatian and English
Open accessAbstract
Previous research has established that naturally produced English clear speech is more intelligible than English conversational speech. The major goal of this paper was to establish the presence of the clear speech effect in production and perception of a language other than English, namely Croatian. A systematic investigation of the conversational-to-clear speech transformations across languages with different phonological properties (e.g., large versus small vowel inventory) can provide a window into the interaction of general auditory-perceptual and phonological, structural factors that contribute to the high intelligibility of clear speech. The results of this study showed that naturally produced clear speech is a distinct, listener-oriented, intelligibility-enhancing mode of speech production in both languages. Furthermore, the acoustic-phonetic features of the conversational-to-clear speech transformation revealed cross-language similarities in clear speech production strategies. In both languages, talkers exhibited a decrease in speaking rate and an increase in pitch range, as well as an expansion of the vowel space. Notably, the findings of this study showed equivalent vowel space expansion in English and Croatian clear speech, despite the difference in vowel inventory size across the two languages, suggesting that the extent of vowel contrast enhancement in hyperarticulated clear speech is independent of vowel inventory size.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory
Lindblom, B. (1990) · Speech Production and Speech Modelling · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-2037-8_16 · Cited by 1,824
A "Rationalized" Arcsine Transform
Studebaker, G. A. (1985) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/jshr.2803.455 · Cited by 1,479
Cross-language analysis of phonetic units in language addressed to infants
Kuhl, P. K., Andruski, J. E., Chistovich, I. A., Chistovich, L. A., Kozhevnikova, E. V., Ryskina, V. L., Stolyarova, E. I., Sundberg, U., & Lacerda, F. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5326.684 · Cited by 1,041
Papers in Laboratory Phonology
(1990) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511627736 · Cited by 843
Picheny, M. A., Durlach, N. I., & Braida, L. D. (1986) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/jshr.2904.434 · Cited by 668
Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics
Bradlow, A. R., Torretta, G. M., & Pisoni, D. B. (1996) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/s0167-6393(96)00063-5 · Cited by 613
Self-citationThe syllable's differing role in the segmentation of French and English
Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., & Segui, J. (1986) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(86)90033-1 · Cited by 604
Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels
Moon, S.-J., & Lindblom, B. (1994) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.410492 · Cited by 488
Ohala, J. J. (1987) · Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society · doi:10.3765/bls.v13i0.1803 · Cited by 473
Speech Production and Speech Modelling
(1990) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-2037-8 · Cited by 432
Cited by
Speaking and Hearing Clearly: Talker and Listener Factors in Speaking Style Changes
Smiljanić, R., & Bradlow, A. R. (2009) · Language and Linguistics Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1749-818x.2008.00112.x · Cited by 306
Self-citationDo you speak E-NG-L-I-SH? A comparison of foreigner- and infant-directed speech
Uther, M., Knoll, M. A., & Burnham, D. (2007) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/j.specom.2006.10.003 · Cited by 300
Acoustics of Clear and Noise-Adapted Speech in Children, Young, and Older Adults
Smiljanic, R., & Gilbert, R. C. (2017) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2017_jslhr-s-16-0130 · Cited by 55
Kim, Y., & Choi, Y. (2017) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2017_jslhr-s-16-0121 · Cited by 44
The Acoustic and Auditory Contexts of Human Behavior
Blake, E. C., & Cross, I. (2015) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/679445 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Smiljanić, R., & Bradlow, A. R.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 2005-09-01
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1677-1688
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W1980941837
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 11.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Production and perception of clear speech in Croatian and English. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.2000788
- The paper
- Smiljanić, R., & Bradlow, A. R. (2005). Production and perception of clear speech in Croatian and English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2000788
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.