Cited by 41Animal Vocal Communication and BehaviorMarine animal studies overviewComparative Animal Anatomy Studies

Acoustic signals of Chinese alligators (Alligator sinensis): Social communication

Wang, Xianyan, Wang, Ding, Wu, Xiaobing, Wang, Renping, Wang, Chaolin·2007·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Abstract

This paper reports the first systematic study of acoustic signals during social interactions of the Chinese alligator (Alligator sinensis). Sound pressure level (SPL) measurements revealed that Chinese alligators have an elaborate acoustic communication system with both long-distance signal-bellowing-and short-distance signals that include tooting, bubble blowing, hissing, mooing, head slapping and whining. Bellows have high SPL and appear to play an important role in the alligator's long range intercommunion. Sounds characterized by low SPL are short-distance signals used when alligators are in close spatial proximity to one another. The signal spectrographic analysis showed that the acoustic signals of Chinese alligators have a very low dominant frequency, less than 500 Hz. These frequencies are consistent with adaptation to a habitat with high density vegetation. Low dominant frequency sound attenuates less and could therefore cover a larger spatial range by diffraction in a densely vegetated environment relative to a higher dominant frequency sound.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1121/1.2714910

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 'Moo' reported by Staniewicz et al. (2023) and Wang et al. (2007) appeared to exhibit distinct spectrographic characteristics, suggesting they may represent acoustically different call types.

    “Upon examination of the spectrograms, the signal, referred to as a ‘Moo’ by both Staniewicz et al. (2023) and Wang et al. (2007) appeared to exhibit distinct spectrographic characteristics, suggesting it may represent acoustically different call types.”
  • It is unknown whether crocodylians produce hissing via the mouth or the nose.

    “Hissing in particular is intriguing, as it is unknown whether animals produce this signal via the mouth (Garrick and Lang 1977) or the nose (Wang et al. 2007).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, X., Wang, D., Wu, X., Wang, R., & Wang, C.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Anhui Normal University (CN)
  • Anhui Research Center for Chinese Alligator Reproduction , Xuancheng 242034, People’s Republic of China
Venue
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2007-05-01
Volume
121
Issue
5
Pages
2984-2989
ISSN
  • 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-8524
OpenAlex
W2016331159
Cited by
41
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institute of Hydrobiology, CAS Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Institute of Hydrobiology
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
Keywords
Chinese alligator, Alligator sinensis, acoustic communication, vocalizations, sound pressure level, long-distance signaling, bubble blowing, hissing, dominant frequency, habitat adaptation
MeSH terms
Acoustics, Alligators and Crocodiles, Animals, Animal Communication, Behavior, Animal, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review