Cited by 189Phonetics and Phonology ResearchCategorization, perception, and languageNeuroscience and Music Perception

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Noncategorical perception of stop consonants differing in VOT

Carney, Arlene Earley, Widin, Gregory P., Viemeister, Neal F.·1977·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The discriminability of bilabial stop consonants differing in VOT (the Abramson–Lisker bilabial series) was measured in a same–different task, an oddity task, and a dual response, discrimination–identification task. Subjects showed excellent within-category discrimination in all three tasks after a moderate amount of training in a same–different task with a fixed standard and with feedback. In addition, discrimination performance continuously improved with increasing stimulus difference for both intra- and intercategory comparisons. Also, subjects were able to alter their identification responses so that well-defined category boundaries fell at arbitrary values determined by the experimenters. These results are not compatible with a strict interpretation of the categorical perception of stop consonants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1121/1.381590

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Sorted by citations

The motor theory of speech perception revised
Liberman, A. M., & Mattingly, I. G. (1985) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(85)90021-6 · Cited by 2,970
“... apparent because the‘casual (or forgetful) listener is assumed to rely on the categorical labels, which persist in memory, rather than on the context-sensitive auditory impressions, which do not; but training or the use of more sensitive psychophysical methods is said to give better access to the auditory stage an…”
Background
Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: A first report
Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E., & Pisoni, D. B. (1991) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1894649 · Cited by 913
“They attempted to modify Japanese listeners’ perception of /r/ and /l/ using a psychophysical procedure developed by Carney et al. (1977). In this procedure, the first stimulus in an AX pair is always the same for a block of trials and only the second stimulus of the pair varies.”
BackgroundMethod
Phonetic learning as a pathway to language: new data and native language magnet theory expanded (NLM-e)
Kuhl, P. K., Conboy, B. T., Coffey-Corina, S., Padden, D., Rivera-Gaxiola, M., & Nelson, T. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2154 · Cited by 886
“The idea that infants began life with phonetic feature detectors that were either maintained or lost was further undermined by adult (Carney et al. 1977; Pisoni et al. 1982; Werker & Tees 1984b, Werker & Logan 1985; Werker 1995; Rivera-Gaxiola et al. 2000) and infant results (Cheour et al. 1998;…”
Background
Infants show a facilitation effect for native language phonetic perception between 6 and 12 months
Kuhl, P. K., Stevens, E., Hayashi, A., Deguchi, T., Kiritani, S., & Iverson, P. (2006) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00468.x · Cited by 867
Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories
Lively, S. E., Logan, J. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1993) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.408177 · Cited by 788
A new view of language acquisition
Kuhl, P. K. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.22.11850 · Cited by 773
Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception.
Ganong, W. F. (1980) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.6.1.110 · Cited by 664
Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants.
Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Sithole, N. M. (1988) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.14.3.345 · Cited by 672
Durational variability in speech and the Rhythm Class Hypothesis
Grabe, E., & Low, E. L. (2002) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110197105.515 · Cited by 961
The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: A perceptual assimilation model.
Best, C. T. (1994) · Cited by 506
Phonetic and Phonological Representation of Stop Consonant Voicing
Keating, P. (1984) · Language · doi:10.2307/413642 · Cited by 475
Central Auditory Plasticity: Changes in the N1-P2 Complex after Speech-Sound Training
Tremblay, K. L., Kraus, N., McGee, T., Ponton, C. W., & Otis, A. B. (2001) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/00003446-200104000-00001 · Cited by 444
“The present study also reinforces that within category distinctions can be enhanced through training (Carney et al., 1977), but that training participants to arbitrarily label two different speech sounds does not result in distinct N1-P2 neural patterns.”
Result
Brain potentials to native and non-native speech contrasts in 7- and 11-month-old American infants
Rivera‐Gaxiola, M., Silva‐Pereyra, J., & Kuhl, P. K. (2005) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00403.x · Cited by 413
“Behavioral studies show that adults’ performance on foreign language contrasts remains above chance, but far below performance by native speakers on the same task ( Carney, Widin & Viemeister, 1977; Werker & Tees, 1984a).”
Background
Categorical Perception: Issues, Methods, Findings
Repp, B. H. (1984) · Speech and language: advances in basic research and practice · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-608610-2.50012-1 · Cited by 429
Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access
McMurray, B., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. Ν. (2002) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00157-9 · Cited by 404
Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants
Best, C. T., & Strange, W. (1992) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/s0095-4470(19)30637-0 · Cited by 401
Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception
Werker, J. F., & Logan, J. S. (1985) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03207136 · Cited by 376
The acquisition of the voicing contrast in English: a study of voice onset time in word-initial stop consonants
Macken, M. A., & Barton, D. (1980) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s0305000900007029 · Cited by 367
Integration of featural information in speech perception.
Oden, G., & Massaro, D. (1978) · Psychology Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.3.172 · Cited by 385
“Using a discrimination task that minimized the sensory interference from successive stimuli, Pisoni and Lazarus (1974) and Carney, Widin, and Viemeister (1977) demonstrated that subjects can reliably discriminate speech sounds that are acoustically different but phonetically the same.”
Method
Intervals, Scales, and Tuning
Burns, E. M. (1999) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012213564-4/50008-1 · Cited by 339
Central Auditory System Plasticity Associated with Speech Discrimination Training
Kraus, N., McGee, T., Carrell, T. D., King, C. D., Tremblay, K. L., & Nicol, T. G. (1995) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1995.7.1.25 · Cited by 319
Effects of discrimination training on the perception of /r-l/ by Japanese adults learning English
Strange, W., & Dittmann, S. (1984) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03202673 · Cited by 317
Developmental changes across childhood in the perception of non-native speech sounds.
Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1983) · Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie · doi:10.1037/h0080725 · Cited by 318
Central auditory system plasticity: Generalization to novel stimuli following listening training
Tremblay, K. L., Kraus, N., Carrell, T. D., & McGee, T. (1997) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.420139 · Cited by 302
“…system does not lose the ability to acquire new linguistic contrasts, provided specific experimental procedures are used to train the listeners~Carney et al., 1977; Aslin and Pisoni, 1980; Strange and Dittmann, 1984; Jamieson and Morosan, 1989; Pisoniet al., 1982; Werker and Tees, 1984a;…”
Background
Auditory Cortex Accesses Phonological Categories: An MEG Mismatch Study
Phillips, C., Pellathy, T., Marantz, A. P., Yellin, E., Wexler, K. N., Poeppel, D., McGinnis, M., & Roberts, T. P. L. (2000) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/08989290051137567 · Cited by 303
“For example, speakers are able to discriminate different members of the same phonetic category ‐ this is clearest for vowels (Fry, Abramson, Eimas, & Liberman, 1962; Pisoni, 1973; Stevens, Liberman, Studdert-Kennedy, & Ohman, 1969) but is also true to some extent for consonants ( Carney, Widin, & Viemeister, 1977 ).”
Background
From general to language-specific capacities: the WRAPSA Model of how speech perception develops
Jusczyk, P. W. (1993) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/s0095-4470(19)31319-1 · Cited by 287
Individual differences in online spoken word recognition: Implications for SLI
McMurray, B., Samelson, V. M., Lee, S. H., & Tomblin, J. B. (2009) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.06.003 · Cited by 277
A comparison of infants' and adults' sensitivity to Western musical structure.
Trainor, L. J., & Trehub, S. E. (1992) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.18.2.394 · Cited by 285
Speech perception as categorization
Holt, L. L., & Lotto, A. J. (2010) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/app.72.5.1218 · Cited by 266
“Its patterns are much weaker for vowels than for stop consonants like /?/ and /M/, for example (Pisoni, 1973), and sensitive methods for measuring discrimination or discrimination training can cause the peaks in discrimination at the boundaries to disappear even for consonants ( Carney, Widin, & Viemeister, 1977; Samu…”
Enhanced discriminability at the phonetic boundaries for the place feature in macaques
Kuhl, P. K., & Padden, D. M. (1983) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.389148 · Cited by 231
Training non-native speech contrasts in adults: Acquisition of the English /ð/-/θ/ contrast by francophones
Jamieson, D. G., & Morosan, D. E. (1986) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03211500 · Cited by 226
Perceptual flexibility: Maintenance or recovery of the ability to discriminate non-native speech sounds.
Tees, R. C., & Werker, J. F. (1984) · Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie · doi:10.1037/h0080868 · Cited by 214
On the internal structure of phonetic categories: a progress report
Miller, J. L. (1994) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)90031-0 · Cited by 212
Experience facilitates olfactory quality discrimination
Rabin, M. D. (1988) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03207487 · Cited by 211
Talker identification based on phonetic information.
Remez, R. E., Fellowes, J. M., & Rubin, P. E. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.23.3.651 · Cited by 262
Natural Referent Vowel (NRV) framework: An emerging view of early phonetic development
Polka, L., & Bohn, O. (2010) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2010.08.007 · Cited by 192
Temporal Encoding of the Voice Onset Time Phonetic Parameter by Field Potentials Recorded Directly From Human Auditory Cortex
Steinschneider, M., Volkov, I. O., Noh, M. D., Garell, P. C., & Howard, M. A. (1999) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1999.82.5.2346 · Cited by 193
“Human listeners are capable, under certain experimental conditions, to discriminate stop consonants located on the same side of the VOT perceptual boundary (Carney et al. 1977; Kewley-Port et al. 1988; Tremblay et al. 1997).”
Background
Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time
Allen, J. S., & Miller, J. L. (2004) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1701898 · Cited by 186
Contextual Effects in Infant Speech Perception
Eimas, P. D., & Miller, J. L. (1980) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7403875 · Cited by 175
Divergent developmental patterns for infants' perception of two nonnative consonant contrasts
Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., LaFleur, R., & Silver-Isenstadt, J. L. (1995) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/0163-6383(95)90022-5 · Cited by 183
Enhanced discriminability at the phonetic boundaries for the voicing feature in macaques
Kuhl, P. K., & Padden, D. M. (1982) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03204208 · Cited by 171
Categorical or continuous speech perception: A new test
Massaro, D. W., & Cohen, M. M. (1983) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/0167-6393(83)90061-4 · Cited by 166
Some effects of laboratory training on identification and discrimination of voicing contrasts in stop consonants.
Pisoni, D. B., Aslin, R. N., Perey, A. J., & Hennessy, B. L. (1982) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.8.2.297 · Cited by 201
Continuous Perception and Graded Categorization
Toscano, J. C., McMurray, B., Dennhardt, J., & Luck, S. J. (2010) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797610384142 · Cited by 162
“This question is difficult to answer with behavioral techniques because they reflect the combined influence of perceptual and categorization processes and are sensitive to task characteristics (Carney et al., 1977; Gerrits & Schouten, 2004; Massaro & Cohen, 1983).”
Background
Gradient sensitivity to within-category variation in words and syllables.
McMurray, B., Aslin, R. Ν., Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey, M. J., & Subik, D. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0011747 · Cited by 166
“Using a same– different task to minimize memory demands, Carney et al. (1977) also showed evidence of within-category sensitivity.”
BackgroundInfluential
From Flexibility to Constraint: The Contrastive Use of Lexical Tone in Early Word Learning
Hay, J. F., Estes, K. G., Wang, T., & Saffran, J. R. (2015) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12269 · Cited by 145
Developmental changes in visual and auditory contributions to speech perception
Massaro, D. W., Thompson, L. A., Barron, B., & Laren, E. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-0965(86)90053-6 · Cited by 144
“& Viemeister, 1977; Massaro & Cohen, 1983a; Pisoni & Lazarus, 1974; Samuel, 1977).”
The Adaptive Self-Organization of Serial Order in Behavior: Speech, Language, And Motor Control
Grossberg, S. (1987) · Advances in psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)61766-5 · Cited by 143
Infants are sensitive to within-category variation in speech perception
McMurray, B., & Aslin, R. Ν. (2004) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.07.005 · Cited by 132
Sources of illusion in consonant cluster perception
Davidson, L., & Shaw, J. A. (2011) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2011.11.005 · Cited by 131
Children's Perception of Visual and Auditory Speech
Massaro, D. W. (1984) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1984.tb00420.x · Cited by 147
Adult and infant perception of two English phones
Pegg, J. E., & Werker, J. F. (1997) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.420137 · Cited by 128
Developmental loss of speech perception: Exposure to and experience with a first language
Burnham, D. K. (1986) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716400007542 · Cited by 124
Individual differences in the acquisition of second language phonology
Golestani, N., & Zatorre, R. J. (2008) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2008.01.005 · Cited by 123
Role of Linguistic Experience in the Perception of Speech
Strange, W., & Jenkins, J. J. (1978) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-2619-9_5 · Cited by 125
Individual differences in categorical perception of speech: Cue weighting and executive function
Kong, E. J., & Edwards, J. (2016) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2016.08.006 · Cited by 119
Intracortical Responses in Human and Monkey Primary Auditory Cortex Support a Temporal Processing Mechanism for Encoding of the Voice Onset Time Phonetic Parameter
Steinschneider, M. (2004) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh120 · Cited by 119
“With training or under low uncertainty psychoacoustical conditions, human subjects can discriminate speech stimuli with short VOTs which lie on the same side of a phonetic perceptual boundary (Carney et al., 1977; Kewley-Port et al., 1988).”
Background
Representation of speech in human auditory cortex: Is it special?
Steinschneider, M., Nourski, K. V., & Fishman, Y. I. (2013) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2013.05.013 · Cited by 119
“Discrimination would require only that the brain distinguish between “single on” and “double on” response patterns, whereas more subtle computations would be necessary for differentiating stop consonants whose VOTs are located on the same side of a perceptual boundary (Carney et al., 1977; Pisoni et al., 1982; Kewley-…”
Perceptual Measures of Speech From Individuals With Parkinson’s Disease and Multiple Sclerosis: Intelligibility and Beyond
Sussman, J. E., & Tjaden, K. (2012) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0048 · Cited by 106
Features as an emergent product of computing perceptual cues relative to expectations
McMurray, B., Cole, J., & Munson, C. (2011) · Language faculty and beyond · doi:10.1075/lfab.6.08mcm · Cited by 102
Evaluating the sources and functions of gradiency in phoneme categorization: An individual differences approach.
Kapnoula, E. C., Winn, M. B., Kong, E. J., Edwards, J., & McMurray, B. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000410 · Cited by 104
“A reliance on labels could lead to a more categorical pattern of responses, even if the precategorized perceptual representation is continuous (see also Carney et al., 1977; Gerrits & Schouten, 2004; Pisoni & Tash, 1974).”
Background
Categories and context in the perception of isolated steady-state vowels.
Repp, B. H., Healy, A. F., & Crowder, R. G. (1979) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.5.1.129 · Cited by 112
Training the perception of Hindi dental and retroflex stops by native speakers of American English and Japanese
Pruitt, J., Jenkins, J. J., & Strange, W. (2006) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.2161427 · Cited by 93
Representation of the voice onset time (VOT) speech parameter in population responses within primary auditory cortex of the awake monkey
Steinschneider, M., Fishman, Y. I., & Arezzo, J. C. (2003) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1582449 · Cited by 93
Two strategies in fricative discrimination
Repp, B. H. (1981) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03214276 · Cited by 91
The myth of categorical perception
McMurray, B. (2022) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0016614 · Cited by 112
Neural patterns to speech and vocabulary growth in American infants
Rivera‐Gaxiola, M., Klarman, L., García‐Sierra, A., & Kuhl, P. K. (2005) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/00001756-200504040-00015 · Cited by 93
“It was argued that the behavior observed at 10–12 months of age and adulthood indicated an immutable loss of an initial universal language ability, though later work showed that adults still remain sensitive to foreign-language contrasts [3–5].”
Background
Transfer of training of a new linguistic contrast in voicing
McClaskey, C. L., Pisoni, D. B., & Carrell, T. D. (1983) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03203044 · Cited by 92
“For example, Carney, Widin, and Viemeister (1977) have demonstrated that discrimination within phonemic categories is possible when the relevant acoustic cues are emphasized during training.”
Background
A unified account of categorical effects in phonetic perception
Kronrod, Y., Coppess, E., & Feldman, N. H. (2016) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1049-y · Cited by 87
Evaluation and integration of acoustic features in speech perception
Massaro, D. W., & Oden, G. C. (1980) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.383941 · Cited by 83
The Acquisition of Second Language Speech
Leather, J., & James, A. R. (1991) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100010019 · Cited by 82
Discrimination of information for manner of articulation
Eimas, P. D., & Miller, J. L. (1980) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/s0163-6383(80)80044-0 · Cited by 77
Discrimination of coronal stops by bilingual adults: The timing and nature of language interaction
Sundara, M., & Polka, L. (2007) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.01.011 · Cited by 72
Frequency and frequency-ratio resolution by possessors of absolute and relative pitch: Examples of categorical perception?
Burns, E. M., & Campbell, S. L. (1994) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.411447 · Cited by 73
The case against a speech mode of perception
Schouten, M. E. H. (1980) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(80)90077-3 · Cited by 73
Mimicry of Non-distinctive Phonetic Differences Between Language Varieties
Flege, J. E., & Hammond, R. M. (1982) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100004563 · Cited by 71
Electrophysiological correlates of cross-linguistic speech perception in native English speakers
Rivera‐Gaxiola, M., Csibra, G., Johnson, M. H., & Karmiloff‐Smith, A. (2000) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(00)00139-x · Cited by 70
“shortening the interstimulus-interval), adult subjects remained capable of discriminating pairs of syllables from within a category [6,36].”
Background
The Adaptive Self-organization of Serial Order in Behavior: Speech, Language, and Motor Control
Grossberg, S. (1986) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-631403-8.50011-4 · Cited by 70
Levels of representation in the electrophysiology of speech perception
Phillips, C. (2001) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2505_5 · Cited by 91
Internal structure of voicing categories in early infancy
Miller, J. L., & Eimas, P. D. (1996) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03207549 · Cited by 65
Probabilistic Constraint Satisfaction at the Lexical/Phonetic Interface: Evidence for Gradient Effects of Within-Category VOT on Lexical Access
McMurray, B., Tanenhaus, M. K., Aslin, R. Ν., & Spivey, M. J. (2003) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1023/a:1021937116271 · Cited by 63
Perceptual representations of phonotactically illegal syllables
Breen, M. E., Kingston, J. K. C., & Sanders, L. D. (2012) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-012-0376-y · Cited by 57
Intervals, Scales, and Tuning
Burns, E. M., & Ward, W. D. (1982) · Psychology of Music · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-213562-0.50012-7 · Cited by 55
Plucks and bows are categorically perceived, sometimes
Cutting, J. E. (1982) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03204856 · Cited by 54
Multiple Book Review ofSpeech perception by ear and eye: A paradigm for psychological inquiry
Massaro, D. W. (1989) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00025619 · Cited by 55
Development of speech perception and speech production abilities in adult second language learners
Gass, S. M. (1984) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716400004835 · Cited by 53
Individual Differences in Language Ability Are Related to Variation in Word Recognition, Not Speech Perception: Evidence From Eye Movements
McMurray, B., Munson, C., & Tomblin, J. B. (2014) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2014_jslhr-l-13-0196 · Cited by 50
Grouping in object recognition: The role of a Gestalt law in letter identification
Pelli, D. G., Majaj, N. J., Raizman, N., et al. (2009) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/13546800802550134 · Cited by 51
Articulation Accuracy and Vocabulary Size Contributions to Phonemic Awareness and Word Reading in English Language Learners.
Roberts, T. A. (2005) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.4.601 · Cited by 50
Assessing the role of experience on infants' speech discrimination
MacKain, K. S. (1982) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s030500090000489x · Cited by 52
The effect of multilingualism on phonetic perceptual flexibility
Werker, J. F. (1986) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716400007360 · Cited by 52
Don't force it! Gradient speech categorization calls for continuous categorization tasks
Apfelbaum, K. S., Kutlu, E., McMurray, B., & Kapnoula, E. C. (2022) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0015201 · Cited by 55
Speech Perception
Studdert‐Kennedy, M. (1980) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/002383098002300106 · Cited by 46
Categorical results do not imply categorical perception
Hary, J. M., & Massaro, D. W. (1982) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03202770 · Cited by 43
The biological basis of speech: What to infer from talking to the animals.
Trout, J. D. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.523 · Cited by 45
Gradient perception of children’s productions of /s/ and /θ/: A comparative study of rating methods
Schellinger, S. K., Munson, B., & Edwards, J. (2016) · Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics · doi:10.1080/02699206.2016.1205665 · Cited by 42
Prosody and Second Language Teaching: Lessons from L2 Speech Perception and Production Research
Lengeris, Α. (2012) · Educational linguistics · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-3883-6_3 · Cited by 38
Neurophysiological Indices of Speech and Nonspeech Stimulus Processing
Tampas, J. W., Harkrider, A. W., & Hedrick, M. S. (2005) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2005/081 · Cited by 36
Age-Related Changes in Long-Term Average Spectra of Children's Voices
Sergeant, D., & Welch, G. F. (2007) · Journal of Voice · doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.03.009 · Cited by 38
Asymmetries in the Discrimination of Musical Intervals: Going Out-of-Tune Is More Noticeable Than Going In-Tune
Schellenberg, E. G. (2001) · Music Perception An Interdisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1525/mp.2001.19.2.223 · Cited by 37

Authors: Carney, A. E., Widin, G. P., & Viemeister, N. F.
Affiliations: University of Minnesota (US)
Venue: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Publisher: Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
Published: 1977-10-01
Volume: 62
Issue: 4
Pages: 961-970
ISSN: 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
1520-8524
DOI: 10.1121/1.381590
OpenAlex: W2029862988
Cited by: 187
References: 0
Citations by year: 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI: 8.86
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords: categorical perception, voice onset time, speech perception, discriminability, category boundaries, auditory training, feedback training, same-different task
MeSH terms: Auditory Perception, Discrimination Learning, Humans, Phonetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Noncategorical perception of stop consonants differing in VOT

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks