The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Talker and listener effects on degree of perceived foreign accent
Abstract
Four experiments were carried out to examine listener- and talker-related factors that may influence degree of perceived foreign accent. In each, native English listeners rated English sentences for degree of accent. It was found that degree of accent is influenced by range effects. The larger the proportion of native (or near-native) speakers included in a set of sentences being evaluated, the more strongly accented listeners judged sentences spoken by non-native speakers to be. Foreign accent ratings were not stable. Listeners judged a set of non-native-produced sentences to be more strongly accented after, as compared to before, they became familiar with those sentences. One talker-related effect noted in the study was the finding that adults’ pronunciation of an L2 may improve over time. Late L2 learners who had lived in the United States for an average of 14.3 years received significantly higher scores than late learners who had resided in the United States for 0.7 years. Another talker-related effect pertained to the age of L2 learning (AOL). Native Spanish subjects with an AOL of five to six years were not found to have an accent (i.e., to receive significantly lower scores than native English speakers), whereas native Chinese subjects with an average AOL of 7.6 year did have a measurable accent. The paper concludes with the presentation of several hypotheses concerning the relationship between AOL and degree of foreign accent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Biological Foundations of Language
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967) · Hospital Practice · doi:10.1080/21548331.1967.11707799 · Cited by 6,605
Maturational constraints on language learning
Newport, E. L. (1990) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1401_2 · Cited by 1,738
Neurolinguists, beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person.
Grosjean, F. (1989) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/0093-934x(89)90048-5 · Cited by 1,490
Flege, J. E. (1987) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/s0095-4470(19)30537-6 · Cited by 1,148
Self-citationMaturational constraints on language development.
Long, M. H. (1990) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100009165 · Cited by 1,090
FOREIGN ACCENTS, LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, AND CEREBRAL DOMINANCE 1
Scovel, T. (1969) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1969.tb00466.x · Cited by 258
Tees, R. C., & Werker, J. F. (1984) · Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie · doi:10.1037/h0080868 · Cited by 214
Cited by
Pronunciation Fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2015) · Language Learning & Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.42 · Cited by 656
Foreign Accent: The Phenomenon of Non-native Speech
Moyer, A. (2013) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511794407 · Cited by 304
Japanese Adults can Learn to Produce English /I/ and /l/ Accurately
Flege, J. E., Takagi, N., & Mann, V. (1995) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/002383099503800102 · Cited by 225
Self-citationSaito, K., & Hanzawa, K. (2018) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168816679030 · Cited by 82
(2010) · ERA · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Flege, J. E., & Fletcher, K. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1992-01-01
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 370-389
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2031438579
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 4.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Talker and listener effects on degree of perceived foreign accent. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.402780
- The paper
- Flege, J. E., & Fletcher, K. L. (1992). Talker and listener effects on degree of perceived foreign accent. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.402780
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.