The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The acoustic features of vowel-like grunt calls in chacma baboons (Papio cyncephalus ursinus): Implications for production processes and functions
Abstract
The acoustic features of 216 baboon grunts were investigated through analysis of field-recorded calls produced by identified females in known contexts. Analyses addressed two distinct questions: whether the acoustic features of these tonal sounds could be characterized using a source-filter approach and whether the acoustic features of grunts varied by individual caller and social context. Converging evidence indicated that grunts were produced through a combination of periodic laryngeal vibration and a stable vocal tract filter. Their acoustic properties closely resembled those of prototypical human vowel sounds. In general, variation in the acoustic features of the grunts was more strongly related to caller identity than to the social contexts of calling. However, two acoustic parameters, second formant frequency and overall spectral tilt, did vary consistently depending on whether the caller was interacting with an infant or participating in a group move. Nonetheless, in accordance with the general view that identity cueing is a compelling function in animal communication, it can be concluded that much of the observed variability in grunt acoustics is likely to be related to this aspect of signaling. Further, cues related to vocal tract filtering appear particularly likely to play an important role in identifying individual calling animals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 · Cited by 15,725
The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
Trivers, R. L. (1971) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/406755 · Cited by 11,010
Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels
Peterson, G. E., & Barney, H. L. (1952) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1906875 · Cited by 2,837
Cited by
Vocal expression of emotions in mammals: mechanisms of production and evidence
Briefer, E. F. (2012) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2012.00920.x · Cited by 541
The different roles of social learning in vocal communication
Janik, V. M., & Slater, P. J. B. (2000) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1410 · Cited by 537
The contribution of source–filter theory to mammal vocal communication research
Taylor, A. M., & Reby, D. (2010) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2009.00661.x · Cited by 407
The acoustic features of human laughter
Bachorowski, J.-A., Smoski, M. J., & Owren, M. J. (2001) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1391244 · Cited by 302
Self-citationFischer, J., Kitchen, D. M., Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (2004) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-003-0739-4 · Cited by 300
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Owren, M. J., Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1997-05-01
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2951-2963
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2012595574
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The acoustic features of vowel-like grunt calls in chacma baboons (Papio cyncephalus ursinus): Implications for production processes and functions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.418523
- The paper
- Owren, M. J., Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (1997). The acoustic features of vowel-like grunt calls in chacma baboons (Papio cyncephalus ursinus): Implications for production processes and functions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.418523
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.