The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The precedence effect
Abstract
In a reverberant environment, sounds reach the ears through several paths. Although the direct sound is followed by multiple reflections, which would be audible in isolation, the first-arriving wavefront dominates many aspects of perception. The “precedence effect” refers to a group of phenomena that are thought to be involved in resolving competition for perception and localization between a direct sound and a reflection. This article is divided into five major sections. First, it begins with a review of recent work on psychoacoustics, which divides the phenomena into measurements of fusion, localization dominance, and discrimination suppression. Second, buildup of precedence and breakdown of precedence are discussed. Third measurements in several animal species, developmental changes in humans, and animal studies are described. Fourth, recent physiological measurements that might be helpful in providing a fuller understanding of precedence effects are reviewed. Fifth, a number of psychophysical models are described which illustrate fundamentally different approaches and have distinct advantages and disadvantages. The purpose of this review is to provide a framework within which to describe the effects of precedence and to help in the integration of data from both psychophysical and physiological experiments. It is probably only through the combined efforts of these fields that a full theory of precedence will evolve and useful models will be developed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wang, Y., Celebrini, S., Trotter, Y., & Barone, P. (2008) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/1471-2202-9-79 · Cited by 144
Evolutionary aspects of bat echolocation
Neuweiler, G. (2003) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A · doi:10.1007/s00359-003-0406-2 · Cited by 101
How the owl tracks its prey – II
Takahashi, T. T. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.031195 · Cited by 34
Castillo-Serrano, J. G., Norman, L. J., Foresteire, D., & Thaler, L. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-81220-9 · Cited by 24
Ekkel, M. R., van Lier, R., & Steenbergen, B. (2017) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-016-4833-z · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Litovsky, R. Y., Colburn, H. S., Yost, W. A., & Guzman, S. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1999-10-01
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1633-1654
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2025127228
- Cited by
- 756
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The precedence effect. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.427914
- The paper
- Litovsky, R. Y., Colburn, H. S., Yost, W. A., & Guzman, S. J. (1999). The precedence effect. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.427914
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.