The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Adaptation by normal listeners to upward spectral shifts of speech: Implications for cochlear implants
Open accessAbstract
Multi-channel cochlear implants typically present spectral information to the wrong “place” in the auditory nerve array, because electrodes can only be inserted partway into the cochlea. Although such spectral shifts are known to cause large immediate decrements in performance in simulations, the extent to which listeners can adapt to such shifts has yet to be investigated. Here, the effects of a four-channel implant in normal listeners have been simulated, and performance tested with unshifted spectral information and with the equivalent of a 6.5-mm basalward shift on the basilar membrane (1.3–2.9 octaves, depending on frequency). As expected, the unshifted simulation led to relatively high levels of mean performance (e.g., 64% of words in sentences correctly identified) whereas the shifted simulation led to very poor results (e.g., 1% of words). However, after just nine 20-min sessions of connected discourse tracking with the shifted simulation, performance improved significantly for the identification of intervocalic consonants, medial vowels in monosyllables, and words in sentences (30% of words). Also, listeners were able to track connected discourse of shifted signals without lipreading at rates up to 40 words per minute. Although we do not know if complete adaptation to the shifted signals is possible, it is clear that short-term experiments seriously exaggerate the long-term consequences of such spectral shifts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Davis, M. H., Johnsrude, I. S., Hervais-Adelman, A., Taylor, K., & McGettigan, C. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.2.222 · Cited by 531
Frequency Map for the Human Cochlear Spiral Ganglion: Implications for Cochlear Implants
Stakhovskaya, O., Sridhar, D., Bonham, B. H., & Leake, P. A. (2007) · Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology · doi:10.1007/s10162-007-0076-9 · Cited by 414
Adverse Listening Conditions and Memory Load Drive a Common Alpha Oscillatory Network
Obleser, J., Wöstmann, M., Hellbernd, N., Wilsch, A., & Maess, B. (2012) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4908-11.2012 · Cited by 224
“In vocoding, the bands were equally spaced using the Greenwood formula (as implemented by Rosen et al., 1999); the filter center frequencies were linearly spaced on the log-frequency axis.”
MethodThe Human Neural Alpha Response to Speech is a Proxy of Attentional Control
Wöstmann, M., Lim, S.-J., & Obleser, J. (2017) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhx074 · Cited by 141
Eisner, F., McGettigan, C., Faulkner, A., Rosen, S., & Scott, S. K. (2010) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4040-09.2010 · Cited by 108
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosen, S., Faulkner, A., & Wilkinson, L.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1999-12-01
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3629-3636
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2068154441
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adaptation by normal listeners to upward spectral shifts of speech: Implications for cochlear implants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.428215
- The paper
- Rosen, S., Faulkner, A., & Wilkinson, L. (1999). Adaptation by normal listeners to upward spectral shifts of speech: Implications for cochlear implants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.428215
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.