Cited by 224Neural dynamics and brain functionCognitive Abilities and TestingNeuroscience and Music Perception

Adverse Listening Conditions and Memory Load Drive a Common Alpha Oscillatory Network

Open access
Obleser, Jonas, Wöstmann, Malte, Hellbernd, Nele, Wilsch, Anna, Maess, Burkhard·2012·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

How does acoustic degradation affect the neural mechanisms of working memory? Enhanced alpha oscillations (8–13 Hz) during retention of items in working memory are often interpreted to reflect increased demands on storage and inhibition. We hypothesized that auditory signal degradation poses an additional challenge to human listeners partly because it draws on the same neural mechanisms. In an adapted Sternberg paradigm, auditory memory load and acoustic degradation were parametrically varied and the magnetoencephalographic response was analyzed in the time–frequency domain. Notably, during the stimulus-free delay interval, alpha power monotonically increased at central–parietal sensors as functions of memory load (higher alpha power with more memory load) and of acoustic degradation (also higher alpha power with more severe acoustic degradation). This alpha effect was superadditive when highest load was combined with most severe degradation. Moreover, alpha oscillatory dynamics during stimulus-free delay were predictive of response times to the probe item. Source localization of alpha power during stimulus-free delay indicated that alpha generators in right parietal, cingulate, supramarginal, and superior temporal cortex were sensitive to combined memory load and acoustic degradation. In summary, both challenges of memory load and acoustic degradation increase activity in a common alpha-frequency network. The results set the stage for future studies on how chronic or acute degradations of sensory input affect mechanisms of executive control.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.4908-11.2012

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Obleser, J., Wöstmann, M., Hellbernd, N., Wilsch, A., & Maess, B.
Affiliations
Max Planck Society (DE)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2012-09-05
Volume
32
Issue
36
Pages
12376-12383
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2042701078
Cited by
224
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7
FWCI
5.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
alpha oscillations, working memory, acoustic degradation, Sternberg paradigm, magnetoencephalography, source localization, parietal cortex, executive function, response time prediction
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Alpha Rhythm, Auditory Perception, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Nerve Net, Reaction Time, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review