The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relationships among age-related differences in gap detection and word recognition
Abstract
The relationships among age-related differences in gap detection and word recognition in subjects with normal hearing or mild sensorineural hearing loss were explored in two studies. In the first study, gap thresholds were obtained for 40 younger and 40 older subjects. The gaps were carried by 150-ms, modulated, low-pass noise bursts with cutoff frequencies of 1 or 6 kHz. The noise bursts were presented at an overall level of 80 dB SPL in three background conditions. Mean gap thresholds ranged between 2.6 and 7.8 ms for the younger age group and between 3.4 and 10.0 ms for the older group. Mean gap thresholds were significantly larger for the older group in all six conditions. Gap thresholds were not significantly correlated with audiometric thresholds in either age group but the 1-kHz gap thresholds increased with age in the younger group. In the second study, the relationships among gap thresholds, spondee-in-babble thresholds, and audiometric thresholds of 66 subjects were examined. Compared with the older subjects, the younger group recognized the spondees at significantly lower (more difficult) spondee-to-babble ratios. In the younger group, spondee-in-babble thresholds were significantly correlated with gap thresholds in conditions of high-frequency masking. In the older group, spondee-in-babble thresholds, gap thresholds, and audiometric thresholds were not significantly correlated, but the spondee-in-babble thresholds and two audiometric thresholds increased significantly with age. These results demonstrate that significant age-related changes in auditory processing occur throughout adulthood. Specifically, age-related changes in temporal acuity may begin decades earlier than age-related changes in word recognition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cohen, J. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155 · Cited by 8,771
How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise.
Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Schneider, B. A., & Daneman, M. (1995) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.412282 · Cited by 1,089
A Modification of a Method for the Detection of Outliers in Multivariate Samples
Hadi, A. S. (1994) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1994.tb01988.x · Cited by 534
Speech recognition in noise and presbycusis: relations to possible neural mechanisms
Frisina, D. R., & Frisina, R. D. (1997) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/s0378-5955(97)00006-3 · Cited by 424
Self-citationTemporal processing in the aging auditory system
Strouse, A., Ashmead, D. H., Ohde, R. N., & Grantham, D. W. (1998) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.423748 · Cited by 401
Gap detection and the precedence effect in young and old adults
Schneider, B. A., Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Kowalchuk, D., & Lamb, M. (1994) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.408403 · Cited by 261
Age-related changes in temporal gap detection
Snell, K. B. (1997) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.418205 · Cited by 246
Self-citationPsychoacoustic and phonetic temporal processing in normal and hearing-impaired listeners
Tyler, R. S., Summerfield, Q., Wood, E. J., & Fernandes, M. A. (1982) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.388254 · Cited by 219
Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. II: Multivariate analyses
van Rooij, J. C. G. M., & Plomp, R. (1990) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.399981 · Cited by 216
Auditory temporal processing in elderly listeners.
Fitzgibbons, P. J., & Gordon-Salant, S. M. (1996) · PubMed · Cited by 190
Cited by
Individual Differences Reveal Correlates of Hidden Hearing Deficits
Bharadwaj, H. M., Masud, S., Mehraei, G., Verhulst, S., & Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (2015) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3915-14.2015 · Cited by 314
Effects of age and frequency disparity on gap discrimination
Lister, J., Besing, J., & Koehnke, J. (2002) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1476685 · Cited by 105
Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Schneider, B. A., Benson, N. J., Hamstra, S. J., & Storzer, E. (2006) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.2149837 · Cited by 90
Aging and speech understanding
Lee, J. Y. (2015) · Journal of Audiology and Otology · doi:10.7874/jao.2015.19.1.7 · Cited by 51
5XFAD Mice Show Early Onset Gap Detection Deficits
Kaylegian, K., Stebritz, A. J., Weible, A. P., & Wehr, M. (2019) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2019.00066 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Snell, K. B., & Frisina, D. R.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 2000-03-01
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1615-1626
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W1996833925
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 4.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relationships among age-related differences in gap detection and word recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.428446
- The paper
- Snell, K. B., & Frisina, D. R. (2000). Relationships among age-related differences in gap detection and word recognition. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.428446
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.