The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Accuracy of Urine Specific Gravity and Osmolality as Indicators of Hydration Status
Abstract
To reduce the adverse consequences of exertion-related and acute intentional dehydration research has focused on monitoring hydration status. This investigation: 1) compared sensitivity of urine specific gravity (U sg ), urine osmolality (U osm ) and a criterion measurement of hydration, plasma osmolality (P osm ), at progressive stages of acute hypertonic dehydration and 2) using a medical decision model, determined whether U sg or U osm accurately reflected hydra-tion status compared to P osm among 51 subjects tested throughout the day. Incremental changes in P osm were observed as subjects dehydrated by 5% of body weight and rehydrated while U sg and U osm showed delayed dehydration-related changes. Using the medical decision model, sensitivity and specificity were not significant at selected cut-offs for U sg and U osm . At the most accurate cut-off values, 1.015 and 1.020 for U sg and 700 m osm /kg and 800 m osm /kg for U osm , only 65% of the athletes were correctly classified using U sg and 63% using U osm . P osm , U sg , and U osm appear sensitive to incremental changes in acute hypertonic dehydration, however, the misclassified outcomes for U sg and U osm raise concerns. Research focused on elucidating the factors affecting accurate assessment of hydration status appears warranted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“With the deluge of data and information currently available within athlete development and sport science [37], the data-informed approach adopted in the present study provides a step toward a more precise, practicality-relevant manner of support stratification and strengthens the utility of decision support systems within a sports science team.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Assessing Hydration Status: The Elusive Gold Standard
Armstrong, L. E. (2007) · Journal of the American College of Nutrition · doi:10.1080/07315724.2007.10719661 · Cited by 643
Assessment of hydration status in a large population
Baron, S., Courbebaisse, M., Lepicard, E. M., & Friedlander, G. (2015) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114514003213 · Cited by 166
Beetroot juice does not enhance altitude running performance in well-trained athletes
Arnold, J. T., Oliver, S. J., Lewis-Jones, T. M., Wylie, L. J., & Macdonald, J. H. (2015) · Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism · doi:10.1139/apnm-2014-0470 · Cited by 66
Effect of a Simulated Heat Wave on Physiological Strain and Labour Productivity
Ioannou, L. G., Mantzios, K., Tsoutsoubi, L., Panagiotaki, Z., Kapnia, A. K., Ciuha, U., Nybo, L., Flouris, A. D., & Mekjavic, I. B. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18063011 · Cited by 51
Heat strain and hydration of Japanese construction workers during work in summer
Ueno, S., Sakakibara, Y., Hisanaga, N., Oka, T., & Yamaguchi-Sekino, S. (2018) · Annals of Work Exposures and Health · doi:10.1093/annweh/wxy012 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Oppliger, R. A., Magnes, S. A., Popowski, L. A., & Gisolfi, C. V.
- Venue
- International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism
- Publisher
- Human Kinetics
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 236-251
- ISSN
- 1526-484X
- 1543-2742
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accuracy of Urine Specific Gravity and Osmolality as Indicators of Hydration Status. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1123/ijsnem.15.3.236
- The paper
- Oppliger, R. A., Magnes, S. A., Popowski, L. A., & Gisolfi, C. V. (2005). Accuracy of Urine Specific Gravity and Osmolality as Indicators of Hydration Status. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsnem.15.3.236
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.