Cited by 643Thermoregulation and physiological responsesBody Composition Measurement TechniquesElectrolyte and hormonal disorders

Assessing Hydration Status: The Elusive Gold Standard

Armstrong, Lawrence E.·2007·Journal of the American College of Nutrition

Abstract

Acknowledging that total body water (TBW) turnover is complex, and that no measurement is valid for all situations, this review evaluates 13 hydration assessment techniques. Although validated laboratory methods exist for TBW and extracellular volume, no evidence incontrovertibly demonstrates that any concentration measurement, including plasma osmolality (P(osm)), accurately represents TBW gain and loss during daily activities. Further, one blood or urine sample cannot validly represent fluctuating TBW and fluid compartments. Future research should (a) evaluate novel techniques that assess hydration in real time and are precise, accurate, reliable, non-invasive, portable, inexpensive, safe, and simple; and (b) clarify the relationship between P(osm) and TBW oscillations in various scenarios.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07315724.2007.10719661

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Armstrong, L. E.
Affiliations
University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
Armstrong, Lawrence E.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Nutrition
Published
2007-10
Volume
26
Issue
sup5
Pages
575S-584S
ISSN
  • 0731-5724 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-1087
OpenAlex
W2111479538
Cited by
643
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 29
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Electrolyte and hormonal disorders
Keywords
hydration assessment, total body water, plasma osmolality, extracellular volume, body fluid compartments, fluid balance, urine osmolality
MeSH terms
Blood Chemical Analysis, Body Water, Dehydration, Humans, Osmolar Concentration, Sensitivity and Specificity, Specific Gravity, Time Factors, Water-Electrolyte Balance, Reproducibility of Results, Urinalysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review