Cited by 42Muscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and TrainingDiet and metabolism studies

Competition Nutrition Practices of Elite Ultramarathon Runners

Stellingwerff, Trent·2016·International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism

Abstract

Anecdotal claims have suggested that an increasing number of ultramarathoners purposely undertake chronic low-carbohydrate (CHO) ketogenic diets while training, and race with very low CHO intakes, as a way to maximize fat oxidation and improve performance. However, very little empirical evidence exists on specific fueling strategies that elite ultramarathoners undertake to maximize race performance. The study’s purpose was to characterize race nutrition habits of elite ultramarathon runners. Three veteran male ultrarunners ( M ± SD ; age 35 ± 2 years; mass 59.5 ± 1.7 kg; 16.7 ± 2.5 hr 100-mi. best times) agreed to complete a competition-specific nutrition intake questionnaire for 100-mi. races. Verbal and visual instructions were used to instruct the athletes on portion sizes and confirm dietary intake. Throughout 2014, the athletes competed in 16 ultramarathons with a total of 8 wins, including the prestigious Western States Endurance Run 100-miler (14.9 hr). The average prerace breakfast contained 70 ± 16 g CHO, 29 ± 20 g protein, and 21 ± 8 g fat. Athletes consumed an average of 1,162 ± 250 g of CHO (71 ± 20g/hr), with minor fat and protein intakes, resulting in caloric intakes totaling 5,530 ± 1,673 kcals (333 ± 105 kcals/hr) with 93% of calories coming from commercial products. Athletes also reported consuming 912 ± 322 mg of caffeine and 6.9 ± 2.4 g of sodium. Despite having limited professional nutritional input into their fueling approaches, all athletes practiced fueling strategies that maximize CHO intake and are congruent with contemporary evidence-based recommendations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/ijsnem.2015-0030

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stellingwerff, T.
Affiliations
Canadian Sport Centre Pacific (CA)
Corresponding author
Stellingwerff, Trent
Venue
International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism
Published
2016-02
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
93-99
ISSN
  • 1526-484X (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-2742
OpenAlex
W655788805
Cited by
42
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
Keywords
ultramarathon, carbohydrate intake, ketogenic diet, fat oxidation, caffeine consumption, sodium intake, elite athletes
MeSH terms
Adult, Energy Intake, Competitive Behavior, Diet, Dietary Carbohydrates, Energy Metabolism, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Running, Athletes, Sports Nutritional Physiological Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review