Cited by 84Thermoregulation and physiological responsesMuscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and Training

Food and Fluid Intake and Disturbances in Gastrointestinal and Mental Function during an Ultramarathon

Glace, Beth, Murphy, Christine, McHugh, Malachy·2002·International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to document eating strategies employed by runners during a 160-km race, and to identify eating patterns that predispose the runner to disturbed mental or gastrointestinal functioning. We monitored intake in 19 volunteers during the 12 hours pre-race. Intake was determined by interview with runners approximately every 12 km throughout the race. The mean finish time was 24.3 hours, with 4 runners not completing the race. Body mass decreased during the race, 75.9 ± 2.3 kg to 74.4 ± 2.2 kg (p < .001). Runners ingested 2643 kcals during the 12 hours prerace (68% carbohydrate) and 3.8 L of fluid. During the race 6047 kcal, 18 L of fluid, and 12 g of sodium were consumed. Gastrointestinal distress (GI) was experienced by half of the participants, but was unrelated to food or fluid intake. Upper GI symptoms were more prevalent than lower and occurred mainly after 88 km. Runners with GI distress tended to complete fewer training miles (p = .10) and to do shorter training runs (p = .08). Half of the volunteers reported mental status changes (MSC), such as confusion or dizziness. Runners with MSC had greater intake of total calories, carbohydrate, and fluid (p < .05) than runners without MSC. They also completed shorter training runs (p = .03). Caloric and moisture intake for all runners far exceeded intakes described previously. Although intake did not match energy expenditure, it may represent the upper limit for absorption during exercise, and very high food and/or fluid intake appears to lead to perturbed mental status.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/ijsnem.12.4.414

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glace, B., Murphy, C., & McHugh, M.
Affiliations
Lenox Hill Hospital (US)
Venue
International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism
Published
2002-12
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
414-427
ISSN
  • 1526-484X (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-2742
OpenAlex
W2105883377
Cited by
84
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
ultramarathon, dietary intake, fluid intake, gastrointestinal distress, mental status changes, dehydration, carbohydrate intake, sodium intake, energy expenditure, endurance running
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Energy Intake, Dehydration, Drinking, Eating, Feeding Behavior, Female, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Humans, Male, Running, Weight Loss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review