High-Dose Probiotic Supplementation Containing Lactobacillus casei for 7 Days Does Not Enhance Salivary Antimicrobial Protein Responses to Exertional Heat Stress Compared With Placebo
Open accessAbstract
The study aimed to determine whether high-dose probiotic supplementation containing Lactobacillus casei (L. casei) for 7 consecutive days enhances salivary antimicrobial protein (S-AMP) responses to exertional–heat stress (EHS). Eight endurance-trained male volunteers (age 26 ± 6 years, nude body mass 70.2 ± 8.8 kg, height 1.75 ± 0.05 m, VO 2max 59 ± 5 ml·kg-1·min-1 [M ± SD]) completed a blinded randomized and counterbalanced crossover design. Oral supplementation of the probiotic beverage (PRO; L. casei × 10 11 colony-forming units·day-1) or placebo (PLA) was consumed for 7 consecutive days before 2 hr running exercise at 60% VO 2max in hot ambient conditions (34.0 °C and 32% RH). Body mass and unstimulated saliva and venous blood samples were collected at baseline (7 days before EHS), pre-EHS, post-EHS (1 hr, 2 hr, and 4 hr), and at 24 hr. Saliva samples were analyzed for salivary (S) IgA, α-amylase, lysozyme, and cortisol. Plasma samples were analyzed for plasma osmolality. Body mass and plasma osmolality did not differ between trials. Saliva flow rate remained relatively constant throughout the experimental design in PRO (overall M ± SD = 601 ± 284 μ1/min) and PLA (557 ± 296 μl/min). PRO did not induce significant changes in resting S-AMP responses compared with PLA (p > .05). Increases in S-IgA, S-α-amylase, and S-cortisol responses, but not S-lysozyme responses, were observed after EHS (p < .05). No main effects of trial or Time × Trial interaction were observed for S-AMP and S-cortisol responses. Supplementation of a probiotic beverage containing L. casei for 7 days before EHS does not provide any further oral–respiratory mucosal immune protection, with respect to S-AMP, over PLA.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Endurance exercise and gut microbiota: A review
Mach, N., & Fuster-Botella, D. (2017) · Journal of Sport and Health Science · doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2016.05.001 · Cited by 361 · see citing works
International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics
Jäger, R., Mohr, A. E., Carpenter, K. C., Kerksick, C. M., Purpura, M., Moussa, A., Townsend, J. R., Lamprecht, M., West, N. P., Black, K., et al. (2019) · Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · doi:10.1186/s12970-019-0329-0 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
“The shortest duration lasted 7 days [75, 76] and the longest lasted 150 days [68].”
BackgroundInfluentialTownsend, J. R., Bender, D., Vantrease, W. C., Sapp, P. A., Toy, A. M., Woods, C. A., & Johnson, K. D. (2018) · Sports · doi:10.3390/sports6030070 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Probiotic supplementation in sports and physical exercise: Does it present any ergogenic effect?
Coqueiro, A. Y., de Oliveira Garcia, A. B., Rogero, M. M., & Tirapegui, J. (2017) · Nutrition and Health · doi:10.1177/0260106017721000 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Mohr, A. E., Pugh, J., O'Sullivan, O., Black, K., Townsend, J. R., Pyne, D. B., Wardenaar, F. C., West, N. P., Whisner, C. M., & McFarland, L. V. (2022) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2022.809983 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“Other investigators have examined biomarkers like cortisol when studying probiotics during stressful periods in college students (53, 82–84) and endurance athletes (85).”
Background
- Authors
- Gill, S. K., Teixeira, A. M., Rosado, F., Cox, M., & Costa, R. J. S.
- Affiliations
- Coventry University (GB)
- University of Coimbra (PT)
- Coimbra University
- Monash University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Costa, Ricardo Jose Soares
- ORCID
- Teixeira, Ana Maria
- Venue
- International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism
- Publisher
- Human Kinetics
- Published
- 2016-04
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 150-160
- ISSN
- 1526-484X (ISSN-L)
- 1543-2742
- OpenAlex
- W1779013757
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 2.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Coventry University Open Collections (Coventry university) (submittedVersion)
- Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- The Open Collections (Coventry University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
- Keywords
- probiotic supplementation, Lactobacillus casei, exertional heat stress, salivary IgA, salivary amylase, salivary lysozyme, salivary cortisol, plasma osmolality, endurance-trained men, exercise in the heat
- MeSH terms
- Adult, alpha-Amylases, Energy Intake, Drinking, Hot Temperature, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Immunoglobulin A, Lacticaseibacillus casei, Male, Muramidase, Saliva, Exercise, Cross-Over Studies, Heat-Shock Response, Probiotics, Antimicrobial Cationic Peptides, Young Adult, Athletes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review