Cited by 25Muscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and TrainingThermoregulation and physiological responses

Case Study: Nutrition Planning and Intake for Marathon des Sables—A Series of Five Runners

McCubbin, Alan J., Cox, Gregory R., Broad, Elizabeth M.·2016·International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism

Abstract

This case study describes the nutrition plans, intakes and experiences of five ultra-marathon runners who completed the Marathon des Sables in 2011 and 2013; age 37 (28–43) y, height 184 (180–190) cm, body mass 77.5 (71–85.5) kg, marathon personal best 3:08 (2:40–3:32). MdS is a 7-day, six-stage ultra-running stage race held in the Sahara Desert (total distance of timed stages 1–5 was 233.2 km in 2011, 223.4 km in 2013). Competitors are required to carry all equipment and food (except water) for the race duration, a minimum of 8,360 kJ/day and total pack weight of 6.5–15 kg. Total food mass carried was 4.2 (3.8–4.7) kg or 0.7 (0.5–1.1) kg/day. Planned energy (13,550 (10,323–18,142) kJ/day), protein (1.3 (0.8–1.8) g/kg/day), and carbohydrate (6.2 (4.3–9.2) g/kg/day) intakes on the fully self-sufficient days were slightly below guideline recommendations, due to the need to balance nutritional needs with food mass to be carried. Energy density was 1,636 (1,475–1,814) kJ/100g. 98.5% of the planned food was consumed. Fluid consumption was ad libitum with no symptoms or medical treatment required for dehydration or hyponatremia. During-stage carbohydrate intake was 42 (20–64) g/hour. Key issues encountered by runners included difficulty consuming foods due to dry mouth, and unpalatability of sweet foods (energy gels, sports drinks) when heated in the sun. Final classification of the runners ranged from 11th to 175th of 970 finishers in 2013, and 132nd of 805 in 2011. The described pattern of intake and macronutrient quantities were positively appraised by the five runners.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/ijsnem.2016-0016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCubbin, A. J., Cox, G. R., & Broad, E. M.
Venue
International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism
Published
2016-12
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
581-587
ISSN
  • 1526-484X (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-2742
OpenAlex
W2341454328
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Keywords
ultramarathon, energy intake, carbohydrate intake, protein intake, energy density, fluid intake, dehydration, hyponatremia, xerostomia, palatability, energy gels, sports drinks, race performance, diet planning, macronutrient balance
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Height, Body Weight, Energy Intake, Dehydration, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Fats, Dietary Proteins, Drinking, Humans, Hyponatremia, Male, Physical Endurance, Running, Water-Electrolyte Balance, Nutrition Assessment, Body Mass Index, Sports Nutritional Physiological Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review