Cited by 21Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorMuscle metabolism and nutritionNutritional Studies and Diet

Factors influencing ultra-endurance athletes food choices: an adapted food choice questionnaire

Open access
Blennerhassett, C, McNaughton, L.R., Sparks, S.A·2019·Research in Sports Medicine

Abstract

Inadequate nutritional intake has been reported during ultra-endurance training and competition. While substandard nutritional knowledge may contribute to inappropriate nutritional choices, the relationship between these variables is often weak. As such, this study investigated the importance of a range of factors to the food choices of ultra-endurance athletes. An existing food choices questionnaire was extended to reflect the main factors proposed to influence the food choices of these athletes. The questionnaire was pilot tested with endurance athletes, during which, it was refined and reassessed for internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Subsequently, 101 experienced ultra-endurance athletes completed the amended questionnaire. Athletes also documented dietary restrictions or strategies employed in preparation for competition. The factors rated as important by the majority of the athletes were "provides me with energy", "do not cause me gastrointestinal discomfort" and, "are nutritious". Despite the high importance of the provision of energy, only 38.2% of participants reported following a high carbohydrate diet in preparation for competition. In addition, given that nutritious foods are typically high in fibre, it is likely that this factor may conflict with the avoidance of gastrointestinal discomfort. The potential incompatibility of these factors may help explain the observed suboptimal nutritional intake.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15438627.2018.1530999

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blennerhassett, C., McNaughton, L. R., & Sparks, S. A.
Affiliations
Edge Hill University (GB)
Corresponding author
Blennerhassett, C
Venue
Research in Sports Medicine
Published
2018-10-14
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
257-271
ISSN
  • 1543-8627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-8635
OpenAlex
W2897072877
Cited by
21
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Research in Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
not-for-profit sectors
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
ultra-endurance athletes, food choice, dietary intake, nutrition knowledge, questionnaire development, carbohydrate intake, gastrointestinal discomfort, dietary fiber, energy supply, competition preparation
MeSH terms
Adult, Energy Intake, Choice Behavior, Female, Food Preferences, Humans, Male, Physical Endurance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Nutrition Assessment, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review