Cited by 44Sports Performance and TrainingMuscle metabolism and nutritionNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

A mismatch between athlete practice and current sports nutrition guidelines among elite female and male middle- and long-distance athletes

Heikura, Ida A., Stellingwerff, Trent, Mero, Antti A., Uusitalo, Arja Leena Tuulia, Burke, Louise M.·2017·International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism

Abstract

Contemporary nutrition guidelines promote a variety of periodized and time-sensitive recommendations, but current information regarding the knowledge and practice of these strategies among world-class athletes is limited. The aim of this study was to investigate this theme by implementing a questionnaire on dietary periodization practices in national/international level female (n = 27) and male (n = 21) middle- and long-distance runners/race-walkers. The questionnaire aimed to gain information on between and within-day dietary choices, as well as timing of pre- and posttraining meals and practices of training with low or high carbohydrate (CHO) availability. Data are shown as percentage (%) of all athletes, with differences in responses between subgroups (sex or event) shown as Chi-square x 2 when p 2 (1, n = 46) = 4.308, p = .038, phi = 0.3])) reported to undertake training in the fasted state, while 11% said they periodically restrict CHO intake, with 30% ingesting CHO during training sessions. Our findings show that elite endurance athletes appear to execute pre- and post-key session nutrition recovery recommendations. However, very few athletes deliberately undertake some contemporary dietary periodization approaches, such as training in the fasted state or periodically restricting CHO intake. This study suggests mismatches between athlete practice and current and developing sports nutrition guidelines.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/ijsnem.2016-0316

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heikura, I. A., Stellingwerff, T., Mero, A. A., Uusitalo, A. L. T., & Burke, L. M.
Corresponding author
Heikura, Ida A.
Venue
International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism
Published
2017-08
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
351-360
ISSN
  • 1526-484X (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-2742
OpenAlex
W2597520259
Cited by
44
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
elite endurance athletes, middle-distance runners, long-distance runners, carbohydrate restriction, protein intake, sex differences, guideline adherence
MeSH terms
Adult, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Proteins, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Periodicity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Running, Walking, Nutrition Policy, Young Adult, Athletes, Sports Nutritional Physiological Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review