Cited by 6Thermoregulation and physiological responsesClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlExercise and Physiological Responses

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sweat Sodium, Potassium, and Chloride Concentrations Analyzed Same Day as Collection Versus After 7 Days Storage in a Range of Temperatures

Baker, Lindsay B., Barnes, Kelly A., Sopeña, Bridget C., Nuccio, Ryan P., Reimel, Adam J., Ungaro, Corey T.·2018·International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of storage temperature on sodium ([Na+]), potassium ([K+]), and chloride ([Cl−]) concentrations of sweat samples analyzed 7 days after collection. Using the absorbent patch technique, 845 sweat samples were collected from 39 subjects (32 ± 7 years, 72.9 ± 10.5 kg) during exercise. On the same day as collection (PRESTORAGE), 609 samples were analyzed for [Na+], [Cl−], and [K+] by ion chromatography (IC) and 236 samples were analyzed for [Na+] using a compact ion-selective electrode (ISE). Samples were stored at one of the four conditions: −20 °C (IC, n = 138; ISE, n = 60), 8 °C (IC, n = 144; ISE, n = 59), 23 °C (IC, n = 159; ISE, n = 59), or alternating between 8 °C and 23 °C (IC, n = 168; ISE, n = 58). After 7 days in storage (POSTSTORAGE), samples were reanalyzed using the same technique as PRESTORAGE. PRESTORAGE sweat electrolyte concentrations were highly related to that of POSTSTORAGE (intraclass correlation coefficient: .945–.989, p < .001). Mean differences (95% confidence intervals) between PRESTORAGE and POSTSTORAGE were statistically, but not practically, significant for most comparisons: IC [Na+]: −0.5(0.9) to −2.1(0.9) mmol/L; IC [K+]: −0.1(0.1) to −0.2(0.1) mmol/L; IC [Cl−]: −0.4(1.4) to −1.3(1.3) mmol/L; ISE [Na+]: −2.0(1.1) to 1.3(1.1) mmol/L. Based on typical error of measurement results, 95% of the time PRESTORAGE and POSTSTORAGE sweat [Na+], [K+], and [Cl−] by IC analysis fell within ±7–9, ±0.6–0.7, and ±9–13 mmol/L, respectively, while sweat [Na+] by ISE was ±6 mmol/L. All conditions produced high reliability and acceptable levels of agreement in electrolyte concentrations of sweat samples analyzed on the day of collection versus after 7 days in storage.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/ijsnem.2017-0199

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When well-sealed and stored at room temperature (23-25 °C), refrigeration (4-8 °C), or frozen (−20 °C) for up to 7 days, minimal sweat evaporation and minimal change in sweat [Na2+], [Cl−], and [K+] has been reported.

    “When well-sealed and stored at room temperature (23–25 °C), refrigeration (4–8 °C), or frozen (− 20 °C) for up to 7 days, minimal sweat evaporation and minimal change in sweat [Na2+], [Cl−], and [K+] has been reported (Baker et al. 2018a; Bergeron et al. 2011; Jones et al. 2008).”

    From Physiological mechanisms determining eccrine sweat composition (2020) · cites this paper as Baker et al. 2018a

  • Differences in sample storage temperature have minimal impact on sweat electrolyte concentrations.

    “Differences in sample storage temperature seem to have minimal impact on sweat electrolyte concentrations”

    From Physiological mechanisms determining eccrine sweat composition (2020) · cites this paper as Baker et al. 2018a

  • Sweat [Na+], [Cl−], and [K+] show negligible changes between same-day analysis and post-7-day storage at −20 °C, 8 °C, and 23 °C in Parafilm-M-sealed vials.

    “found negligible changes in sweat [Na+], [Cl−], and [K+] between same-day analysis and post-7-day storage (in Parafilm-M®-sealed vials) at − 20 °C, 8 °C, and 23 °C”

    From Physiological mechanisms determining eccrine sweat composition (2020) · cites this paper as Baker et al. 2018a

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Armstrong, L.E., & Casa, D.J. (2009). Methods to evaluate electrolyte and water turnover of athletes. Athletic Training and Sports Health Care, 1(4), 169–179.
  2. Baker, L.B., Ungaro, C.T., Barnes, K.A., Nuccio, R.P., Reimel, A.J., & Stofan, J.R. (2014). Validity and reliability of a field technique for sweat Na+ and K+ analysis during exercise in a hot-humid environment. Physiological Reports, 2(5), 12007. PubMed doi:10.14814/phy2.12007 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bergeron, J., Bachmann, L.M., & Miller, W.G. (2011). Influence of sample storage conditions on sweat chloride results. Clinical Chemistry, 57(4), 641–643. PubMed doi:10.1373/clinchem.2010.160267 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Collie, J.T., Massie, R.J., Jones, O.A., LeGrys, V.A., & Greaves, R.F. (2014). Sixty-five years since the New York heat wave: Advances in sweat testing for cystic fibrosis. Pediatric Pulmonology, 49(2), 106–117. PubMed doi:10.1002/ppul.22945 · DOI
  5. Goulet, E.D., Asselin, A., Gosselin, J., & Baker, L.B. (2017). Measurement of sodium concentration in sweat samples: Comparison of five analytical techniques. Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism, 42(8), 861–868. PubMed doi:10.1139/apnm-2017-0059 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Green, A., & Kirk, J. (2007). Guidelines for the performance of the sweat test for the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry, 44(Pt. 1), 25–34. PubMed doi:10.1258/000456307779596011 · DOI
  7. Hayden, G., Milne, H.C., Patterson, M.J., & Nimmo, M.A. (2004). The reproducibility of closed-pouch sweat collection and thermoregulatory responses to exercise-heat stress. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 91(5–6), 748–751. doi:10.1007/s00421-004-1057 · DOI
  8. Jones, P.M., McCullom, V., Moore, G., & Eckhardt, J. (2008). How soon is “promptly”? Storage and handling of samples for the analysis of sweat chloride. Lab Medicine, 39(9), 547–549. doi:10.1309/D4TL5KEVJV0YKF66 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Lott, M.J., & Galloway, S.D. (2011). Fluid balance and sodium losses during indoor tennis match play. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism, 21(6), 492–500. PubMed doi:10.1123/ijsnem.21.6.492 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Maughan, R.J., & Shirreffs, S.M. (2010). Development of hydration strategies to optimize performance for athletes in high-intensity sports and in sports with repeated intense efforts. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 20(Suppl. 2), 59–69. PubMed doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01191.x · DOI
  11. McDermott, B.P., Casa, D.J., Yeargin, S.W., Ganio, M.S., Lopez, R.M., & Mooradian, E.A. (2009). Hydration status, sweat rates, and rehydration education of youth football campers. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 18(4), 535–552. PubMed doi:10.1123/jsr.18.4.535 · DOI
  12. Osterberg, K.L., Horswill, C.A., & Baker, L.B. (2009). Pregame urine specific gravity and fluid intake by National Basketball Association players during competition. Journal of Athletic Training, 44(1), 53–57. PubMed doi:10.4085/1062-6050-44.1.53 · DOI
  13. Shirreffs, S.M., & Maughan, R.J. (1997). Whole body sweat collection in humans: An improved method with preliminary data on electrolyte content. Journal of Applied Physiology, 82(1), 336–341. PubMed doi:10.1152/jappl.1997.82.1.336 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Williams, C.A., & Blackwell, J. (2012). Hydration status, fluid intake, and electrolyte losses in youth soccer players. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 7(4), 367–374. PubMed doi:10.1123/ijspp.7.4.367 · DOI
  15. Yeargin, S.W., Casa, D.J., Judelson, D.A., McDermott, B.P., Ganio, M.S., Lee, E.C., … Maresh, C.M. (2010). Thermoregulatory responses and hydration practices in heat-acclimatized adolescents during preseason high school football. Journal of Athletic Training, 45(2), 136–146. PubMed doi:10.4085/1062-6050-45.2.136 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Baker, L. B., Barnes, K. A., Sopeña, B. C., Nuccio, R. P., Reimel, A. J., & Ungaro, C. T.
Affiliations
Gatorade Sports Science Institute (US)
Venue
International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism
Published
2018-05-01
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
238-245
ISSN
  • 1526-484X (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-2742
OpenAlex
W2768318991
Cited by
6
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Medical Laboratory Technology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
sweat electrolytes, sodium, potassium, chloride, storage temperature, sample stability, ion chromatography, ion-selective electrodes, physical activity, measurement error, sweat osmolality, sweat pH, sweat volume, sweat potassium, sweat sodium
MeSH terms
Adult, Chlorides, Electrolytes, Female, Humans, Male, Potassium, Sodium, Specimen Handling, Sweat, Temperature, Reproducibility of Results, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review