The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Internal and External Training Load: 15 Years On
Abstract
Exercise is a stressor that induces various psychophysiological responses, which mediate cellular adaptations in many organ systems. To maximize this adaptive response, coaches and scientists need to control the stress applied to the athlete at the individual level. To achieve this, precise control and manipulation of the training load are required. In 2003, the authors introduced a theoretical framework to define and conceptualize the measurable constructs of the training process. They described training load as having 2 measurable components: internal and external load. The aim of this commentary is to extend, clarify, and refine both the theoretical framework and the definitions of internal and external training load to avoid misinterpretation of this concept.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This is since the internal load borne by an individual athlete corresponding to a specific stimulus will vary depending on the specific contextual factors of their internal environment, such as achieving sufficient sleep and energy balance, along with the nature of the sport [152,156,157,158,159], thus highlighting the importance of both sleep and nutrition in facilitating recovery to minimise an”
From Sleep, Nutrition, and Injury Risk in Adolescent Athletes: A Narrative Review (2023) · cites this paper as [152]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mann, T. N., Lamberts, R. P., & Lambert, M. I. (2014) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-014-0197-3 · Cited by 379
Vollaard, N. B. J., Constantin-Teodosiu, D., Fredriksson, K., Rooyackers, O., Jansson, E., Greenhaff, P. L., Timmons, J. A., & Sundberg, C. J. (2009) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.91453.2008 · Cited by 205 · cited 1×
“23 In addition, from a conceptual point of view, there are additional advantages in integrating internal and external load measures for monitoring training.”
Cited by
Dose-Response Matters! - A Perspective on the Exercise Prescription in Exercise-Cognition Research
Herold, F., Müller, P., Gronwald, T., & Müller, N. G. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02338 · Cited by 196
Bok, D., Rakovac, M., & Foster, C. (2022) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-022-01690-3 · Cited by 89
Sleep, Nutrition, and Injury Risk in Adolescent Athletes: A Narrative Review
Mason, L., Connolly, J., Devenney, L. E., Lacey, K., O’Donovan, J., & Doherty, R. (2023) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu15245101 · Cited by 50
A Review of Striking Force in Full-Contact Combat Sport Athletes: Methods of Assessment
Lenetsky, S., Uthoff, A., Coyne, J., & Cronin, J. (2022) · Strength & Conditioning Journal · doi:10.1519/ssc.0000000000000643 · Cited by 26
Naughton, M., McLean, S., Scott, T. J., Weaving, D., & Solomon, C. (2021) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2021.711634 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Impellizzeri, F. M., Marcora, S. M., & Coutts, A. J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
- Publisher
- Human Kinetics
- Published
- 2019-02
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 270-273
- ISSN
- 1555-0265 (ISSN-L)
- 1555-0273
- OpenAlex
- W2908304785
- Cited by
- 972
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 94.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
