The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Applications of GPS Technologies to Field Sports
Abstract
Global positioning system (GPS) technology was made possible after the invention of the atomic clock. The first suggestion that GPS could be used to assess the physical activity of humans followed some 40 y later. There was a rapid uptake of GPS technology, with the literature concentrating on validation studies and the measurement of steady-state movement. The first attempts were made to validate GPS for field sport applications in 2006. While GPS has been validated for applications for team sports, some doubts continue to exist on the appropriateness of GPS for measuring short high-velocity movements. Thus, GPS has been applied extensively in Australian football, cricket, hockey, rugby union and league, and soccer. There is extensive information on the activity profile of athletes from field sports in the literature stemming from GPS, and this includes total distance covered by players and distance in velocity bands. Global positioning systems have also been applied to detect fatigue in matches, identify periods of most intense play, different activity profiles by position, competition level, and sport. More recent research has integrated GPS data with the physical capacity or fitness test score of athletes, game-specific tasks, or tactical or strategic information. The future of GPS analysis will involve further miniaturization of devices, longer battery life, and integration of other inertial sensor data to more effectively quantify the effort of athletes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Movement patterns in cricket vary by both position and game format.
Petersen, C. J., Pyne, D., Dawson, B., Portus, M., & Kellett, A. (2010) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640410903348665 · Cited by 182
Cited by
Soligard, T., Schwellnus, M., Alonso, J.-M., Bahr, R., Clarsen, B., Dijkstra, H. P., Gabbett, T., Gleeson, M., Hägglund, M., Hutchinson, M. R., et al. (2016) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096581 · Cited by 1,041
Schwellnus, M., Soligard, T., Alonso, J.-M., Bahr, R., Clarsen, B., Dijkstra, H. P., Gabbett, T. J., Gleeson, M., Hägglund, M., Hutchinson, M. R., et al. (2016) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096572 · Cited by 836
Anderson, L., Orme, P., Di Michele, R., Close, G. L., Morgans, R., Drust, B., & Morton, J. P. (2016) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640414.2015.1106574 · Cited by 211
Gastin, P. B., Hunkin, S. L., Fahrner, B., & Robertson, S. (2019) · Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/jsc.0000000000003023 · Cited by 82
McNamara, D. J., Gabbett, T. J., Chapman, P., Naughton, G., & Farhart, P. (2015) · International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance · doi:10.1123/ijspp.2014-0062 · Cited by 69
McNamara, D. J., Gabbett, T. J., Chapman, P., Naughton, G., & Farhart, P. (2015) · International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance · doi:10.1123/ijspp.2014-0497 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Aughey, R. J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
- Publisher
- Human Kinetics
- Published
- 2011-09
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 295-310
- ISSN
- 1555-0265 (ISSN-L)
- 1555-0273
- OpenAlex
- W159271591
- Cited by
- 468
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.