Cited by 92Motivation and Self-Concept in SportsSport Psychology and PerformanceSports and Physical Education Research

Predicting Sport Experience During Training: The Role of Change-Oriented Feedback in Athletes’ Motivation, Self-Confidence and Needs Satisfaction Fluctuations

Carpentier, Joëlle, Mageau, Geneviève A.·2016·Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology

Abstract

Change-oriented feedback (COF) quality is predictive of between-athletes differences in their sport experience (Carpentier & Mageau, 2013). This study extends these findings by investigating how training-to-training variations in COF quality influence athletes’ training experience (within-athlete differences) while controlling for the impact of promotion-oriented feedback (POF). In total, 49 athletes completed a diary after 15 consecutive training sessions to assess COF and POF received during training, as well as situational outcomes. Multivariate multilevel analyses showed that, when controlling for covariates, COF quality during a specific training session is positively linked to athletes’ autonomous motivation, self-confidence and satisfaction of their psychological needs for autonomy and relatedness during the same session. In contrast, COF quantity is negatively linked to athletes’ need for competence. POF quality is a significant positive predictor of athletes’ self-confidence and needs for autonomy and competence. Contributions to the feedback and SDT literature, and for coaches’ training, are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/jsep.2015-0210

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In sport athletes, both training-to-training and game-to-game variation in experienced need-supportiveness are predictive of athletes' self-confidence, autonomous sport motivation and their pro-and anti-social play.

    “For instance, in sport athletes, both training-to-training (Carpentier and Mageau 2016) and game-to-game (Delrue et al. 2017) variation in experienced need-supportiveness are predictive of athletes' self-confidence, autonomous sport motivation and their pro-and anti-social play.”

    From Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions (2020) · cites this paper as Carpentier and Mageau 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carpentier, J., & Mageau, G. A.
Affiliations
Université de Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Carpentier, Joëlle
Venue
Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
Published
2016-02
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
45-58
ISSN
  • 0895-2779 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-2904
OpenAlex
W2306470194
Cited by
92
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
13.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Sports and Physical Education Research
Keywords
sport experience, training experience, autonomous motivation, self-confidence, psychological need satisfaction, autonomy, relatedness, competence, self-determination theory, coach feedback
MeSH terms
Mentoring, Adolescent, Child, Feedback, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Personal Satisfaction, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Sports, Multivariate Analysis, Personal Autonomy, Young Adult, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review