CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 157Sport Psychology and PerformanceMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsGrit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Passion in Referees: Examining Their Affective and Cognitive Experiences in Sport Situations

Philippe, Frederick L., Vallerand, Robert J., Andrianarisoa, Joéline, Brunel, Philippe·2009·Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
DOI 10.1123/jsep.31.1.77
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The present research examined in two studies the role of passion for refereeing in referees' affective and cognitive functioning during games. In line with past research on the dualistic model of passion (Vallerand et al., 2003), Study 1 (n1 = 90 and n2 = 148) revealed that harmonious passion (HP) for refereeing was positively associated with positive emotions and the experience of flow during games. Conversely, obsessive passion (OP) for refereeing was unrelated to positive emotions and flow, but was positively associated with negative emotional experiences during games. Study 2 (n = 227) examined referees' affective and cognitive functioning after having committed an important mistake. Results showed that HP was negatively associated with maladaptive affective and cognitive functioning after a bad call, whereas OP was positively associated with such maladaptive functioning, including subsequent poor decision making. In addition, in both studies, most referees reported to be passionate toward refereeing. Finally, results from both studies remained the same after controlling for referees' gender, age, years of experience, and types of sports.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/jsep.31.1.77

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–157 of 157

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Philippe, F. L., Vallerand, R. J., Andrianarisoa, J., & Brunel, P.
Affiliations
  • 1McGill University
  • Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
  • Université de Limoges (FR)
ORCID
Vallerand, Robert J.
Venue
Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
Publisher
Human Kinetics
Published
2009-02
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
77-96
ISSN
  • 0895-2779 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-2904
DOI
10.1123/jsep.31.1.77
OpenAlex
W1500381339
Cited by
157
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
11.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
Keywords
harmonious passion, obsessive passion, dualistic model of passion, flow, positive emotions, negative emotions, decision-making, emotional functioning, cognitive function
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Cognition, Decision Making, Emotions, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, France, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Soccer, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review